David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (204):437 - 450 (2011)
Aquinas’s ’five ways’ are not to be understood as demonstrative proofs, successful or not, for the existence of God. Rather, they provide a necessary step towards supplying licensable surrogates for the essential predications that cannot logically be drawn from the incomprehensible nature of God, yet would seem needed for the ’Summa‘s declared genre of argued theology. (Predication ’secundum analogiam’ provides surrogates for nonrelational accidental predications, likewise unavailable.) What Aquinas is proving in arguing ’deum esse’ in ’St’ I.2.3 is not God’s actual existence (see ’St’ I.3.4 ad 2) but an alternative interpretation of "God’s being something" where "God is something" is a placeholder for, say, "God is prime mover" or, more explicitly, for such (necessary) identities as "The prime mover is the necessitated necessitator," an identity whose necessity depends at more than one place on the assumption of God’s existence from faith, not on demonstrative proof of God’s existen
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Norman Kretzmann (1999). The Metaphysics of Creation: Aquinas's Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles II. Clarendon Press.
Paul Gilbert (2009). Et hoc dicimus Deum. Giornale di Metafisica 31 (3):465 - 480.
George I. Mavrodes (1970). The Rationality of Belief in God. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
R. E. Houser (2011). Aristotle and Two Medieval Aristotelians on the Nature of God. International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):355 - 375.
Rudi A. Te Velde (2003). ‘The First Thing to Know About God’: Kretzmann and Aquinas on the Meaning and Necessity of Arguments for the Existence of God. Religious Studies 39 (3):251-267.
Norman Kretzmann (2001). The Metaphysics of Theism: Aquinas's Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles I. Clarendon Press.
A. R. E. (1965). Summa Theologiae la 2-11: Existence and Nature of God (Vol. II). Review of Metaphysics 19 (2):367-367.
Anthony Kenny (1980). The Five Ways: St. Thomas Aquinas' Proofs of God's Existence. University of Notre Dame Press.
Anthony Kenny (1969). The Five Ways: Saint Thomas Aquinas' Proofs of God's Existence. London, Routledge & K. Paul.
Lydia Schumacher (2011). The Lost Legacy of Anselm's Argument: Re-Thinking the Purpose of Proofs for the Existence of God. Modern Theology 27 (1):87 - 101.
David Twetten (2006). On Which 'God' Should Be the Target of a 'Proof of God's Existence'. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:75-80.
Charles Billingsley (2009). God Laughs: And Other Surprising Things You Never Knew About Him. Regal Books.
Elmer L. Towns (2009). God Laughs: And Other Surprising Things You Never Knew About Him. Regal Books.
Richard Messer (1993). Does God's Existence Need Proof? Oxford University Press.
Paul Weingartner (2011). God's Existence: Can It Be Proven? A Logical Commentary on the Five Ways of Thomas Aquinas. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):243 - 248.
Added to index2012-06-17
Total downloads5 ( #237,662 of 1,101,939 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,846 of 1,101,939 )
How can I increase my downloads?