International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (3):147 - 168 (2005)
|Abstract||Locke considers miracles to be crucial in establishing the credibility and reasonableness of Christian faith and revelation. The performance of miracles, he argues, is vital in establishing the “credit of the proposer” who makes any claim to providing a divine revelation. He accords reason a pivotal role in distinguishing spurious from genuine claims to divine revelation, including miracles. According to Locke, genuine miracles contain the hallmark of the divine such that pretend revelations become intuitively obvious. This paper argues that serious tensions exist in Locke’s position regarding miracles, which impact on the reasonableness of the assent to Christianity which he presumes they provide.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
By John Whipple (2008). Hobbes on Miracles. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (1):117–142.
John Earman (2000). Hume's Abject Failure: The Argument Against Miracles. Oxford University Press.
James A. Keller (1995). A Moral Argument Against Miracles. Faith and Philosophy 12 (1):54-78.
Michael Almeida (2007). Martin on Miracles. Philo 10 (1):27-34.
Jacqueline Mariña (1998). The Theological and Philosophical Significance of the Markan Account of Miracles. Faith and Philosophy 15 (3):298-323.
David Mckenzie (1999). Miracles Are Not Immoral: A Response to James Keller's Moral Argument Against Miracles. Religious Studies 35 (1):73-88.
Jake H. O'Connell (2013). Divine Hiddenness: Would More Miracles Solve the Problem? Heythrop Journal 54 (2):261-267.
Richard Otte (2004). Review of Fogelin, A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 30 (1):165-68.
Travis Dumsday (2008). Locke on Competing Miracles. Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):416-424.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #81,690 of 722,765 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,765 )
How can I increase my downloads?