The ontological basis of legal hermeneutics: A proposed model of inquiry based on the work of Gadamer, Habermas and Ricoeur
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This paper provides a detailed account of Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics and its relationship to contemporary problems in legal theory. I first demonstrate that Gadamer's approach charts a course between the inflated claims of critical legal studies and the subjectivism of the law and literature movement. I then interrogate the hermeneutical approach from the perspective of Habermas's critical theory. I conclude that Ricoeur's intervention in the Gadamer-Habermas debate helps significantly to draw out the critical elements of Gadamer's work. I conclude by developing new model of legal practice and theory grounded in the textuality of law.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Altaf Hossain (2007). Gadamer's Hermeneutics. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 11:69-78.
Austin Harrington (2000). Objectivism in Hermeneutics? Gadamer, Habermas, Dilthey. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (4):491-507.
Francisco J. Gonzalez (2006). Dialectic and Dialogue in the Hermeneutics of Paul Ricœur and H.G. Gadamer. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):313-345.
Hans-Georg Gadamer & Hugh J. Silverman (eds.) (1991). Gadamer and Hermeneutics. New York ;Routledge.
Robert Piercey (2004). Ricoeur's Account of Tradition and the Gadamer–Habermas Debate. Human Studies 27 (3):259-280.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #71,719 of 1,089,053 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,053 )
How can I increase my downloads?