|Abstract||Legal education fails students by not appreciating the rhetorical basis of legal reasoning and argumentation. I draw from Vico's "On the Study Methods of Our Time" and Llewellyn's legal realism; both argued that law and legal reasoning are exemplary sites of rhetoric. I suggest that contemporary cognitive studies of the metaphorical structure of human understanding and the initiatives of the "new legal realism" carry forward the insights of Vico and Llewellyn. This re-orientation corrects the shallow and instrumentalist outlook of most lawyers.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
James R. Maxeiner, The Rules of Law in the Reform of Legal Education: Teaching the Legal Mind in Japanese Law Schools.
Kurt Nutting (2002). Legal Practices and the Reason of the Law. Argumentation 16 (1):111-133.
Robert S. Summers (1984). Lon L. Fuller. Stanford University Press.
Adam Thurschwell (2009). On Continental Philosophy in American Jurisprudence. In Francis J. Mootz & William S. Boyd (eds.), On Philosophy in American Law. Cambridge University Press.
C. J. Friedrich (1964). Karl Llewellyn's Legal Realism in Retrospect:Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice Karl Llewellyn. Ethics 74 (3):201-.
David E. Ingersoll (1966). Karl Llewellyn, American Legal Realism, and Contemporary Legal Behavioralism. Ethics 76 (4):253-266.
I. I. I. Mootz, Perelman in Legal Education: Recalling the Rhetorical Tradition of Isocrates and Vico.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #57,832 of 722,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,867 )
How can I increase my downloads?