Aquinas according to the horizon of distance: Jean-Luc Marion's phenomenological reading of thomistic analogy
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):59-77 (2007)
Ever since the publication of Dieu sans l’être in 1982, Jean-Luc Marion’s various (and varying) pronouncements on the status and meaning of esse in Aquinas have excited a good deal of interest and controversy among Thomists. Marion’s evolving understanding of Thomistic metaphysics in general, and of Thomistic analogy in particular, has been commended for its openness to correction even as it has been criticized for what many still regard as its residual deficiencies. All such criticisms, however, neglect to take account of the phenomenological provenance of Marion’s concerns, and to this extent they risk misunderstanding them. Ironically, Marion’s phenomenological approach to Aquinas intends to safeguard precisely what his Thomist critics think he has jettisoned: namely, our ability to speak about God in a way that says something meaningful—or perhaps better, reveals something meaningful—about God to us. The apophatic language Marionuses to make this point should be taken as a reminder to his fellow Christians (and especially to those who happen to be Thomists) who rightfully desire to speak of God about the danger that is involved in doing so. If we interpret Aquinas’s use of the divine names according to the phenomenological horizon of distance and thus think the various names of God “according to truly theological determinations,” Marion suggests, we can avoid the danger of lapsing into a conceptual idolatry of univocal predication that occludes their phenomenological disclosiveness
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jean-Luc Marion (1999). On Descartes' Metaphysical Prism: The Constitution and the Limits of Onto-Theo-Logy in Cartesian Thought. University of Chicago Press.
Declan Lawell (2009). Thomas Aquinas, Jean-Luc Marion, and an Alleged Category Mistake Involving God and Being. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (1):23-50.
Jean-Luc Marion (2001). The Idol and Distance: Five Studies. Fordham University Press.
Jeffrey L. Kosky (2004). Philosophy of Religion and Return to Phenomenology in Jean-Luc Marion. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):629-647.
Michael B. Ewbank (2002). Of Idols, Icons, and Aquinas's Esse. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (2):161-175.
Patricia A. Johnson (2008). Reviews of Reading Jean-Luc Marion: Exceeding Metaphysics and of Counter Experiences: Reading Jean-Luc Marion. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (3):173 - 178.
Jean-Luc Marion (1991/2012). God Without Being: Hors-Texte. University of Chicago Press.
Christina M. Gschwandtner (2010). À Dieu or From the Logos? Emmanuel Lévinas and Jean-Luc Marion—Prophets of the Infinite. Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):177-203.
Joeri Schrijvers (2010). Marion, Levinas, and Heidegger on the Question Concerning Ontotheology. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (2):207-239.
Derek J. Morrow (2006). Aquinas, Marion, Analogy, and Esse. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):25-42.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #176,896 of 1,789,925 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #197,702 of 1,789,925 )
How can I increase my downloads?