An independence relation for sets of secrets
Studia Logica 94 (1) (2010)
| Abstract | A relation between two secrets, known in the literature as nondeducibility , was originally introduced by Sutherland. We extend it to a relation between sets of secrets that we call independence . This paper proposes a formal logical system for the independence relation, proves the completeness of the system with respect to a semantics of secrets, and shows that all axioms of the system are logically independent. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSaharon Shelah (1980). Independence of Strong Partition Relation for Small Cardinals, and the Free-Subset Problem. Journal of Symbolic Logic 45 (3):505-509.
Jean Bodin (1975). Colloquium of the Seven About Secrets of the Sublime =. Princeton University Press.
Michiel Van Lambalgen (1990). The Axiomatization of Randomness. Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (3):1143 - 1167.
T. Thacher Robinson (1968). Independence of Two Nice Sets of Axioms for the Propositional Calculus. Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (2):265-270.
Nancy Tuana (1994). Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death. The Personalist Forum 10 (1):47-49.
Wolfgang Spohn (1980). Stochastic Independence, Causal Independence, and Shieldability. Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (1):73 - 99.
Fabio G. Cozman (2012). Sets of Probability Distributions, Independence, and Convexity. Synthese 186 (2):577-600.
Adam Świeżyński (2011). The Philosophy of Nature, Chance, and Miracle. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (3).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-02-01Total downloads12 ( #93,386 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
