David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Critical Realism 10 (1):60-79 (2010)
The focus of this article is the analysis of generative mechanisms, a basic concept and phenomenon within the metatheoretical perspective of critical realism. It is emphasized that research questions and methods, as well as the knowledge it is possible to attain, depend on the basic view – ontologically and epistemologically – regarding the phenomenon under scrutiny. A generative mechanism is described as a trans empirical but real existing entity, explaining why observable events occur. Mechanisms are mostly possible to grasp only indirectly by analytical work (theory-building), based however on empirical observations. In order to achieve such an explanatory analysis, five methodological steps are suggested and discussed, among them abduction and retroduction. These steps are illustrated throughout by examples drawn from empirical research regarding social work practice. The article is concluded with a discussion of the need for knowledge of generative mechanisms
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Roy Bhaskar (1998). General Introduction. I Margaret Acher, Roy Bashkar, Andrew Collier, Tony Lawson & Alan Norrie (Red.). In Margaret Scotford Archer (ed.), Critical Realism: Essential Readings. Routledge.
Roy Bhaskar (1998). The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Routledge.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stefan Morén & Björn Blom (2007). Explaining Human Change: On Generative Mechanisms in Social Work Practice. Journal of Critical Realism 2 (1):37-60.
Dieter Bichlbauer (1998). Some Considerations About the Further Development of Situational Analysis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (3):422-433.
Zenonas Norkus (2005). Mechanisms as Miracle Makers? The Rise and Inconsistencies of the "Mechanismic Approach" in Social Science and History. History and Theory 44 (3):348–372.
Renate Mayntz (2004). Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2):237-259.
Jeffrey C. Schank & William C. Wimsatt (1986). Generative Entrenchment and Evolution. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:33 - 60.
Nathalie Bulle (2009). Under What Conditions Can Formal Models of Social Action Claim Explanatory Power? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (1):47-64.
Karl-Dieter Opp (2005). Explanations by Mechanisms in the Social Sciences. Problems, Advantages and Alternatives. Mind and Society 4 (2):163-178.
Frederic Vandenberghe (1999). "The Real is Relational": An Epistemological Analysis of Pierre Bourdieu's Generative Structuralism. Sociological Theory 17 (1):32-67.
William Bechtel, Understanding Biological Mechanisms: Using Illustrations From Circadian Rhythm Research.
Julian Reiss (2007). Do We Need Mechanisms in the Social Sciences? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (2):163-184.
Stuart S. Glennan (1996). Mechanisms and the Nature of Causation. Erkenntnis 44 (1):49--71.
Stephen Galoob (2012). How Do Roles Generate Reasons? A Method of Legal Ethics. Legal Ethics 15 (1):1-28.
Christian Bassac, Bruno Mery & Christian Retoré (2010). Towards a Type-Theoretical Account of Lexical Semantics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (2):229-245.
Olaf Fisscher, André Nijhof & Herman Steensma (2003). Dynamics in Responsible Behaviour in Search of Mechanisms for Coping with Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):209 - 224.
Added to index2011-03-03
Total downloads25 ( #75,893 of 1,168,031 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,420 of 1,168,031 )
How can I increase my downloads?