Are the bundle theory and the substratum theory really twin Brothers?

Axiomathes 19 (1):73--85 (2009)
Abstract
In a recent paper, Jiri Benovsky argues that the bundle theory and the substratum theory, traditionally regarded as ‘deadly enemies’ in the metaphysics literature, are in fact ‘twin brothers’. That is, they turn out to be ‘equivalent for all theoretical purposes’ upon analysis. The only exception, according to Benovsky, is a particular version of the bundle theory whose distinguishing features render unappealing. In the present reply article, I critically analyse these undoubtedly relevant claims, and reject them.
Keywords Bare particular  Substratum  Compresence  Ontology  Equivalence  Property  Identity  Individuation  Haecceitism  Identity of the Indiscernibles  Perdurantism  Endurantism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Matteo Morganti, Are the bundle theory and the substratum theory really twin Brothers?
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 19 references

Citations of this work BETA
Andrew M. Bailey (2012). No Bare Particulars. Philosophical Studies 158 (1):31-41.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

183 ( #3,355 of 1,101,544 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

15 ( #11,381 of 1,101,544 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.