David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This thesis examines the concept of civil disobedience, and the role the latter can play in a democratic society. It aims to offer a moral justification for civil disobedience that departs from consequentialist or deontological considerations, and focuses instead on virtue ethics. By drawing attention to the notion of civic virtues, the thesis suggests that, under some circumstances, an act of civil disobedience is the very act displaying a virtuous disposition in the citizen who disobeys. Such disposition is interpreted in light of a duty each individual has to respect her fellow citizens as autonomous agents. This grounds, in turn, a moral obligation to respect the law. The central claim of the thesis is that the obligation towards the law is fulfilled not only through acts of obedience but also, under different circumstances, through acts of disobedience. The status of non-violence as a necessary component of civil disobedience is questioned, and it is argued that a degree of force or violence may be permissible in civil disobedience, when it is compatible with the duty to respect others’ autonomy. Subsequently, the thesis offers an analysis of ‘reasonableness’ as a civic virtue, and by comparing three different approaches to the issue of reasonable disagreement among democratic citizens, it defends the deliberative approach as the most suited for treating fellow citizens as autonomous agents. The last two chapters focus on the importance, for an act of civil disobedience, of the agent’s willingness to accept the legal consequences of her law-breaking behaviour. It is argued that a civil disobedient has an obligation to face the prospect of being punished for the breach of the law. However, in considering the behaviour of a virtuous civil disobedient who appears at her criminal trial, it is also claimed that she should plead not guilty and aim to persuade her fellow citizens that she does not deserve to be punished, because what she did does not constitute a criminal wrong. In doing so, this thesis depicts civil disobedience not as a merely permissible form of behaviour, but as a morally praiseworthy conduct within a democratic community
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Michael Martin (1990). Ecosabotage and Civil Disobedience. Environmental Ethics 12 (4):291-310.
Vinit Haksar (1976). Rawls and Gandhi on Civil Disobedience. Inquiry 19 (1-4):151 – 192.
Fred R. Berger (1970). 'Law and Order' and Civil Disobedience. Inquiry 13 (1-4):254 – 273.
Kimberley Brownlee (2004). Features of a Paradigm Case of Civil Disobedience. Res Publica 10 (4):337-351.
Jennifer Welchman (2001). Is Ecosabotage Civil Disobedience? Philosophy and Geography 4 (1):97 – 107.
Kimberley Brownlee (2012). Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience. Oxford University Press.
Brian J. Huschle (2002). Cyber Disobedience. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):69-83.
Sophie Turenne (2004). Judicial Responses to Civil Disobedience: A Comparative Approach. Res Publica 10 (4):379-399.
William Smith (2004). Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. Res Publica 10 (4):353-377.
Brian E. Butler (2010). Where Is the Civil in the Invisible Man's Disobedience? In Harold Bloom Blake Hobby (ed.), Bloom's Literary Themes: Civil Disobedience.
Brian Smart (1978). Defining Civil Disobedience. Inquiry 21 (1-4):249 – 269.
Edward H. Madden (1968). Civil Disobedience and Moral Law in Nineteenth-Century American Philosophy. Seattle, University of Washington Press.
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-04-15
Total downloads20 ( #70,463 of 1,012,699 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,884 of 1,012,699 )
How can I increase my downloads?