David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (1):75-92 (2005)
We propose in this paper DIAL, a framework for inter-agents dialogue, which formalize a collective decision-making process to compose divergent interests and perspectives. This framework bounds a dialectics system in which argumentative agents play and arbitrate to reach an agreement. For this purpose, we propose an argumentation-based reasoning to manage the conflicts between arguments having different strengths for different agents. Moreover, we propose a model of argumentative agents which justify the hypothesis to which they commit and take into account the commitments of their interlocutors according to their reputations. In the scope of our dialectics system, a third agent is responsible of the final decision outcome which is taken by resolving the conflict between two players according to their competences and the advanced arguments.
|Keywords||Multi-agents system dialogue|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John R. Searle (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Douglas Walton & Erik C. W. Krabbe (1995). Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press.
C. L. Hamblin (1970/1993). Fallacies. Vale Press.
Peter McBurney & Simon Parsons (2002). Games That Agents Play: A Formal Framework for Dialogues Between Autonomous Agents. [REVIEW] Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (3):315-334.
Ch Perelman & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca (1971). Traité de l'argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 33 (1):188-189.
Citations of this work BETA
Marc Lauritsen (2015). On Balance. Artificial Intelligence and Law 23 (1):23-42.
Similar books and articles
Fernando Tohmé (2002). Negotiation and Defeasible Decision Making. Theory and Decision 53 (4):289-311.
Clare M. Pennino (2002). Is Decision Style Related to Moral Development Among Managers in the U.S.? Journal of Business Ethics 41 (4):337 - 347.
Magnus Boman (1999). Norms in Artificial Decision Making. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (1):17-35.
Christian List (2008). Deliberation and Agreement. In Shawn W. Rosenberg (ed.), Can the People Govern? Deliberation, Participation and Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan
Patrick Humphreys & Garrick Jones (2006). The Evolution of Group Decision Support Systems to Enable Collaborative Authoring of Outcomes. World Futures 62 (3):193 – 222.
Rivka Grundstein-Amado (1991). An Integrative Model of Clinical-Ethical Decision Making. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
Marc D. Street, Chris Robertson & Scott W. Geiger (1997). Ethical Decision Making: The Effects of Escalating Commitment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (11):1153-1161.
Roselie McDevitt, Catherine Giapponi & Cheryl Tromley (2007). A Model of Ethical Decision Making: The Integration of Process and Content. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 73 (2):219 - 229.
Long-Chuan Lu, Gregory M. Rose & Jeffrey G. Blodgett (1999). The Effects of Cultural Dimensions on Ethical Decision Making in Marketing: An Exploratory Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 18 (1):91 - 105.
Jukka Varelius (2009). Collective Informed Consent and Decision Power. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):39-50.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #232,970 of 1,792,869 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #207,320 of 1,792,869 )
How can I increase my downloads?