David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In an 1896 letter to Wilhelm Fliess, the first and primary confidante for his fledgling ideas, the young Sigmund Freud wrote: “I see that you are using the circuitous route of medicine to attain your first ideal, the physiological understanding of man, while I secretly nurse the hope of arriving by the same route at my own original objective, philosophy. For that was my original ambition, before I knew what I was intended to do in the world.”1 When philosophy is mentioned in his later, published, writings, it will normally be an occasion for Freud to disavow any such connection with the enterprise of psychoanalysis, a repeated gesture of denial that naturally only goes to show how profound the relationship must really be. For many years now, Jonathan Lear has been one of the great mediators between the worlds of philosophy and psychoanalysis, showing us what they have to learn from each other, and what they have difficulty 1 accepting from each other. In these lectures he explores a connection between a stance toward oneself that is furthered in the psychoanalytic session, and a stance towards one‟s life to which Kierkegaard gives the name „irony‟. I will begin my remarks with some thoughts about the general picture of irony presented in Professor Lear‟s lectures, and its relation to certain philosophical claims for the role of what is variously called „critical reflection‟, „self-consciousness‟, or the metaphor of “stepping back” from some aspect of one‟s thought or engagement in the world. I will then focus on the idea of self-knowledge at play in the lectures and the role of something called „expression‟ in this context
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Lear (2005). Freud. Routledge.
Jonathan Lear (2011). A Case for Irony. Harvard University Press.
Jonathan Lear (1990/1998). Love and its Place in Nature: A Philosophical Interpretation of Freudian Psychoanalysis. Yale University Press.
Axel Honneth (2008). Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea (Tanner Lectures). Oxford University Press.
Jonathan Lear (2000). Happiness, Death, and the Remainder of Life. Harvard University Press.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (2009). Comments on Jonathan Lear's Radical Hope (Harvard: 2006). Philosophical Studies 144 (1):63 - 70.
Stan van Hooft (2009). Book Note: Lear, Jonathan,Radical Hope: Ethics in the Face of Cultural Devastation, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2006, Pp. 197, US$15.95 (Paperback). [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (2):356-356.
Nancy Sherman (2009). The Fate of a Warrior Culture: Nancy Sherman on Jonathan Lear's "Radical Hope" (Harvard: 2006). Philosophical Studies 144 (1):71 - 80.
Jonathan Lear (1998). Open Minded: Working Out the Logic of the Soul. Harvard University Press.
Norman Daniels, Sherry Glied, Mark Peterson & Uwe Reinhardt, American Values in Health Care: A Case of Cognitive Dissonance - Symposium on the Tanner Lecture on Human Values.
John Rawls (2007). Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Jonathan Lear (2004). Psychoanalysis and the Idea of a Moral Psychology: Memorial to Bernard Williams' Philosophy. Inquiry 47 (5):515 – 522.
Added to index2011-07-19
Total downloads45 ( #90,614 of 1,792,844 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,764 of 1,792,844 )
How can I increase my downloads?