Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||This study examines social issues shareholder resolutions filed at S&P 500 companies in 2007. These firms received 86% of all social issues resolutions filed. Findings indicate that green resolutions were the most common single type (30% of social issues resolutions), but nearly one third (32%) of resolutions contained non-traditional content. Firms were more likely to be targeted if they were large in size and demonstrated poor treatment of employees and customers. As might be expected, the primary sponsors of social issues resolutions were socially responsible investment funds, religious groups, and pension funds. Surprisingly, over half (52%) of resolutions made it onto proxy ballots in 2007, while there was sufficient dialogue between the target companies and shareholder activists for filers to withdraw only 29% of the resolutions (although 41% of green resolutions were withdrawn). Resolution content and firm response differed by type of filer|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kathleen Rehbein, Jeanne M. Logsdon & Harry J. Buren (2013). Corporate Responses to Shareholder Activists: Considering the Dialogue Alternative. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 112 (1):137-154.
Jeanne M. Logsdon, Harry van Buren Iii & Kathleen Rehbein (2008). Social Responsibility Ratings and Corporate Responses to Activist Shareholder Resolutions. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:307-317.
Douglas M. McCabe (2000). Global Labor and Worksite Standards: A Strategic Ethical Analysis of Shareholder Employee Relations Resolutions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 23 (1):101 - 110.
Wendy Horwitz (2000). Environmental Dilemmas: The Resolutions of Student Activists. Ethics and Behavior 10 (3):281 – 308.
Joakim Sandberg (2011). Changing the World Through Shareholder Activism? Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 5 (1):51-78.
Donald H. Schepers (2007). A Network Analysis of Shareholder Activism. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:351-356.
Jeanne M. Logsdon & Harry J. Van Buren (2009). Beyond the Proxy Vote: Dialogues Between Shareholder Activists and Corporations. Journal of Business Ethics 87:353 - 365.
Dale Kurschner (1995). Shareholder Resolutions. Business Ethics 9 (2):14-15.
Matthew Haigh & James Hazelton (2004). Financial Markets: A Tool for Social Responsibility? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 52 (1):59-71.
Michael Schur (1976). Achievement Need Versus Moral Judgment. Journal of Moral Education 5 (3):275-293.
Karen Paul (1989). Corporate Social Monitoring in South Africa: A Decade of Achievement, an Uncertain Future. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (6):463 - 469.
Suzanne Metselaar (2011). The Structural Similarity Between the Itinerarium Mentis in Deum and the Collationes in Hexaemeron with Regard to Bonaventure's Doctrine of God as First Known. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):43-75.
Troy D. Sadler * (2004). Moral Sensitivity and its Contribution to the Resolution of Socio‐Scientific Issues. Journal of Moral Education 33 (3):339-358.
Sandra L. Christensen & Kymberli Grime (2006). Transparency and Corporate Governance. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:209-212.
Victoria B. McWilliams (2008). The Ethical Implications of Ignoring Shareholder Directives to Remove Antitakeover Provisions. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (3):321-346.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-18
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?