Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 7:37-47 (2008)
|Abstract||Dummett has recently presented his most mature and sophisticated version of justificationism, i.e. the view that meaning and truth are to be analysed in terms of justifiability. In this paper, I argue that this conception does not resolve a difficulty that also affected Dummett’s earlier version of justificationism: the problem that large tracts of the past continuously vanish as their traces in the present dissipate. Since Dummett’s justificationism is essentially based on the assumption that the speaker has limited (i.e. non-idealized) cognitive powers, no further refinement of this position is likely to settle the problem of the vanishing past|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kevin Falvey (2010). The View From Nowhen: The Mctaggart-Dummett Argument for the Unreality of Time. Philosophia 38 (2).
Ofra Magidor (2007). Strict Finitism Refuted? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107 (1pt3):403-411.
John P. Burgess (1984). Dummett's Case for Intuitionism. History and Philosophy of Logic 5 (2):177-194.
Cheng-Hung Tsai (2010). Practical Knowledge of Language. Philosophia 38 (2).
Carlo Penco (2007). Idiolect and Context. In L. E. Hahn (ed.), Library of Living Philosphers: the Philosophy of Michael Dummett. Open Court.
Josh Parsons (2005). Truthmakers, the Past, and the Future. In Helen Beebee & Julian Dodd (eds.), Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Clarendon.
Cheng-Hung Tsai (2006). Can, or Should, Dummett Solve the Delivery Problem? Auslegung 28 (1):21-43.
Christopher Peacocke (2005). Justification, Realism and the Past. Mind 114 (455):639-670.
Michael Dummett (2004). Truth and the Past. Columbia University Press.
Anat Matar (1997). From Dummett's Philosophical Perspective. W. De Gruyter.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #38,656 of 556,909 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #6,190 of 556,909 )
How can I increase my downloads?