David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (2):175 - 219 (1995)
Discontinuity refers to the character of many natural language constructions wherein signs differ markedly in their prosodic and semantic forms. As such it presents interesting demands on monostratal computational formalisms which aspire to descriptive adequacy. Pied piping, in particular, is argued by Pollard (1988) to motivate phrase structure-style feature percolation. In the context of categorial grammar, Bach (1981, 1984), Moortgat (1988, 1990, 1991) and others have sought to provide categorial operators suited to discontinuity. These attempts encounter certain difficulties with respect to model theory and/or proof theory, difficulties which the current proposals are intended to resolve.Lambek calculus is complete for interpretation byresiduation with respect to the adjunction operation of groupoid algebras (Buszkowski 1986). In Moortgat and Morrill (1991) it is shown how to give calculi for families of categorial operators, each defined by residuation with respect to an operation of prosodic adjunction (associative, non-associative, or with interactive axioms). The present paper treats discontinuity in this way, by residuation with respect to three adjunctions: + (associative), (.,.) (split-point marking), andW (wrapping) related by the equations 1+s 2+s 3=(s 1,s 3)Ws 2. We show how the resulting methods apply to discontinuous functors, quantifier scope and quantifier scope ambiguity, pied piping, and subject and object antecedent reflexivisation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Dag Prawitz (1965). Natural Deduction: A Proof-Theoretical Study. Dover Publications.
Gerald Gazdar, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Pullum & Ivan Sag (1989). Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Philosophical Review 98 (4):556-566.
Dov M. Gabbay (1996). Labelled Deductive Systems. Oxford University Press.
Tanya Reinhart (1983). Coreference and Bound Anaphora: A Restatement of the Anaphora Questions. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 6 (1):47 - 88.
Joachim Lambek (1968). The Mathematics of Sentence Structure. Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (4):627-628.
Citations of this work BETA
Glyn Morrill, Oriol Valentín & Mario Fadda (2011). The Displacement Calculus. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (1):1-48.
Graeme Forbes (2010). Intensional Verbs in Event Semantics. Synthese 176 (2):227 - 242.
Glyn Morrill (1996). Grammar and Logic. Theoria 62 (3):260-293.
Similar books and articles
Christian Retoré & Sylvain Salvati (2010). A Faithful Representation of Non-Associative Lambek Grammars in Abstract Categorial Grammars. Journal of Logic Language and Information 19 (2):185-200.
Michael Moortgat (2009). Symmetric Categorial Grammar. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (6):681 - 710.
Jochen Dörre, Esther König & Dov Gabbay (1996). Fibred Semantics for Feature-Based Grammar Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5 (3-4):387-422.
Yde Venema (1996). Tree Models and (Labeled) Categorial Grammar. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5 (3-4):253-277.
Carlos Areces & Raffaella Bernardi (2004). Analyzing the Core of Categorial Grammar. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (2):121-137.
Raffaella Bernardi (2004). Analyzing the Core of Categorial Grammar. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (2):121-137.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #304,368 of 1,934,456 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #195,826 of 1,934,456 )
How can I increase my downloads?