David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (2):175 - 219 (1995)
Discontinuity refers to the character of many natural language constructions wherein signs differ markedly in their prosodic and semantic forms. As such it presents interesting demands on monostratal computational formalisms which aspire to descriptive adequacy. Pied piping, in particular, is argued by Pollard (1988) to motivate phrase structure-style feature percolation. In the context of categorial grammar, Bach (1981, 1984), Moortgat (1988, 1990, 1991) and others have sought to provide categorial operators suited to discontinuity. These attempts encounter certain difficulties with respect to model theory and/or proof theory, difficulties which the current proposals are intended to resolve.Lambek calculus is complete for interpretation byresiduation with respect to the adjunction operation of groupoid algebras (Buszkowski 1986). In Moortgat and Morrill (1991) it is shown how to give calculi for families of categorial operators, each defined by residuation with respect to an operation of prosodic adjunction (associative, non-associative, or with interactive axioms). The present paper treats discontinuity in this way, by residuation with respect to three adjunctions: + (associative), (.,.) (split-point marking), andW (wrapping) related by the equations 1+s 2+s 3=(s 1,s 3)Ws 2. We show how the resulting methods apply to discontinuous functors, quantifier scope and quantifier scope ambiguity, pied piping, and subject and object antecedent reflexivisation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Graeme Forbes (2010). Intensional Verbs in Event Semantics. Synthese 176 (2):227 - 242.
Glyn Morrill, Oriol Valentín & Mario Fadda (2011). The Displacement Calculus. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (1):1-48.
Similar books and articles
Carlos Areces & Raffaella Bernardi (2004). Analyzing the Core of Categorial Grammar. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (2):121-137.
Yde Venema (1996). Tree Models and (Labeled) Categorial Grammar. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5 (3-4):253-277.
Jochen Dörre, Esther König & Dov Gabbay (1996). Fibred Semantics for Feature-Based Grammar Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5 (3-4):387-422.
Michael Moortgat (2009). Symmetric Categorial Grammar. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (6):681 - 710.
Christian Retoré & Sylvain Salvati (2010). A Faithful Representation of Non-Associative Lambek Grammars in Abstract Categorial Grammars. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (2):185-200.
Raffaella Bernardi (2004). Analyzing the Core of Categorial Grammar. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (2):121-137.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #459,665 of 1,102,030 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #306,606 of 1,102,030 )
How can I increase my downloads?