Distinctions: Subpersonal and subconscious
Psycoloquy (1993)
| Abstract | Puccetti argues that Dennett's views on split brains are defective. First, we criticise Puccetti's argument. Then we distinguish persons, minds, consciousnesses, selves and personalities. Then we introduce the concepts of part-persons and part-consciousnesses, and apply them to clarifying the situation. Finally, we criticise Dennett for some contribution to the confusion. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Peter Walla, Katharina Greiner, Cornelia Duregger, Lüder Deecke & Stefan Thurner (2007). Self-Awareness and the Subconscious Effect of Personal Pronouns on Word Encoding: A Magnetoencephalography (MEG) Study. Neuropsychologia 45 (4):796-809.
Charles L. Y. Cheng (1978). On Puccetti's Two-Persons View of Man. Southern Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):605-616.
York H. Gunther (1995). Perceptual Content and the Subpersonal. Conference 6 (1):31-45.
Susan L. Hurley (1998). Vehicles, Contents, Conceptual Structure and Externalism. Analysis 58 (1):1-6.
Paul Yu & Gary Fuller (1986). A Critique of Dennett. Synthese 66 (March):453-76.
Roland Puccetti (1993). Dennett on the Split-Brain. Psycoloquy 4 (52).
Joseph Margolis (1975). Puccetti on Brains, Minds, and Persons. Philosophy of Science 42 (September):275-280.
Sara Worley (1997). Belief and Consciousness. Philosophical Psychology 10 (1):41-55.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads10 ( #106,196 of 549,014 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,014 )How can I increase my downloads? |

