Journal of Philosophy 70 (15):503-510 (1973)
|Abstract||I discuss Quine's claim that anyone denying what we now take to be a logical truth would be using logical words in a novel way. I trace this to a confusions between outright denial and failure to assert, and assertion of a negation. (This abstract is written from memory decades after the article.)|
|Keywords||Quine change of logic logical truth|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Catherine Z. Elgin & Nelson Goodman (1987). Changing the Subject. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 46:219-223.
Donald B. Marquis (1991). Four Versions of Double Effect. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):515-544.
Arvind Sharma (1999). The Puruṣārthas: An Axiological Exploration of Hinduism. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (2):223 - 256.
Cornelis van Putten (2006). Changing the Past: Retrocausality and Narrative Construction. Metaphilosophy 37 (2):254–258.
Oswald Hanfling (1995). Changing the Subject. Philosophy 70 (273):448 - 452.
Paul Thom (2000). On Changing the Subject. Metaphilosophy 31 (1-2):63-74.
William Carter (1989). Changing the Minimal Subject. Philosophical Studies 57 (2):217 - 226.
John Cottingham (2002). Review: Pluralism in Philosophy: Changing the Subject. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (441):126-129.
Alistair M. Macleod (2010). G. A. Cohen on the Rawlsian Doctrine of the Basic Structure as Subject. Social Philosophy Today 26:153-163.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,123 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?