David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):21-35 (2001)
On a Molinist account of creation and providence, not only is there is a complete set of truths about what every possible person would freely do in any possible set of circumstances, but these conditional truths are part of the very explanation of our existence. Robert Adams has recently argued that the explanatory priority of these conditionals undermines libertarian freedom. In the present essay, I take at close look at Adams’ argument and at the Molinist response of Thomas Flint. After showing that Flint’s response is inadequate, I develop what I believe to be a more successful Molinist response to Adams’ argument. Along the way, I seek to provide some insight into the nature of libertarian freedom and the proper interpretation of the much discussed “principle of alternate possibilities.”
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ken Perszyk (2013). Recent Work on Molinism. Philosophy Compass 8 (8):755-770.
Similar books and articles
Thomas P. Flint (2001). A Death He Freely Accepted. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):3-20.
Theodore Guleserian (2008). Ontological Determination and the Grounding Objection to Counterfactuals of Freedom. Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):394-415.
Christopher J. Kosciuk, Human Freedom in a World Full of Providence: An Ockhamist-Molinist Account of the Compatibility of Divine Foreknowledge and Creaturely Free Will.
Dean A. Kowalski (2003). Some Friendly Molinist Amendments. Philosophy and Theology 15 (2):385-401.
Thomas P. Flint (2001). 'A Death He Freely Accepted': Molinist Reflections on the Incarnation. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):3-20.
William Lane Craig (1998). ``On Hasker's Defense of Anti-Molinism&Quot. Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):236-240.
William Lane Craig (1998). On Hasker's Defense of Anti-Molinism. Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):236-240.
William Hasker (1997). Explanatory Priority: Transitive and Unequivocal, a Reply to William Craig. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):389-393.
William Hasker (1999). A New Anti-Molinist Argument. Religious Studies 35 (3):291-297.
Joseph Shieber (2009). Personal Responsibility and Middle Knowledge: A Challenge for the Molinist. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (2):61 - 70.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #169,577 of 1,100,742 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #80,589 of 1,100,742 )
How can I increase my downloads?