David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Today 17 (4):311-318 (1973)
It is argued that in beginning ``being and nothingness'' with the absolute ontological distinction between the for-itself (pure nothingness) and the in-itself (pure being), sartre makes it impossible to understand how the phenomenological account of experience which comes later in the work could be correct. attention is paid almost entirely to the critique of sartre implicit in the chapter of merleau-ponty's ``phenomenology of perception'' titled 'the cogito'. merleau-ponty's divergence from sartre is seen to center around his critique of sartre on the nature of the in-itself, the world, and the pre-reflective 'cogito'.
|Keywords||Metaphysics consciousness ontology phenomenology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Felicity Joseph & Jack Reynolds (2011). Existentialism, Phenomenology and Philosophical Method. In Felicity Joseph, Jack Reynolds & Ashley Woodward (eds.), Continuum Companion to Existentialism. Continuum
M. C. Dillon (1974). Sartre on the Phenomenal Body and Merleau-Ponty's Critique. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 5:144-158.
Françoise Dastur (2011). The Question of the Other in French Phenomenology. Continental Philosophy Review 44 (2):165-178.
Joseph C. Bereudzen (2001). What is Political Writing?: Sartre and Merleau-Ponty on Literature and the Expression of Meaning. Sartre Studies International 7 (2):44-57.
Nebojsa Kujundzic & William Buschert (1994). Instruments and the Body: Sartre and Merleau-Ponty. Research in Phenomenology 24 (1):206-215.
Christopher E. Macann (1993). Four Phenomenological Philosophers: Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty. Routledge.
Jon Stewart (ed.) (1998). The Debate Between Sartre and Merleau-Ponty. Northwestern University Press.
R. M. Zaner (1964). The Problem Of Embodiment; Some Contributions To A Phenomenology Of The Body. The Hague: Nijhoff.
James Schmidt (1979). Lordship and Bondage in Merleau-Ponty and Sartre. Political Theory 7 (2):201-227.
Added to index2009-07-07
Total downloads18 ( #172,982 of 1,779,059 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #167,974 of 1,779,059 )
How can I increase my downloads?