Synthese 111 (1):97-114 (1997)
|Abstract||In natural language we rarely use relation-words with more than three argument places. This paper studies one systematic device, rooted in natural language, by which relations of greater adicity can be expressed. It is based on a higher-order relation between 1-place, 2-place, and 4-place relations (and so on) of which the relation between the positive and comparative degrees of a predicate is a special case. Two formal languages are presented in this connection, one of which represents the language of communication and the other the contextual information against which the first language is interpreted. A semantical theory is described, which treats the two languages in an interdependent way. Logical consequence is non-compact. Connections with issues about vagueness are made.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Max Kölbel (1998). Lewis, Language, Lust and Lies. Inquiry 41 (3):301 – 315.
Cody Gilmore (forthcoming). Parts of Propositions. In Shieva Kleinschmidt (ed.), Mereology and Location. Oxford University Press.
Gabriel Sandu (1994). Some Aspects of Negation in English. Synthese 99 (3):345 - 360.
Yasuhito Suzuki, Frank Wolter & Michael Zakharyaschev (1998). Speaking About Transitive Frames in Propositional Languages. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (3):317-339.
Christopher D. Viger (2005). Learning to Think: A Response to the Language of Thought Argument for Innateness. Mind and Language 20 (3):313-25.
Volker Halbach (1995). Tarski Hierarchies. Erkenntnis 43 (3):339 - 367.
George Lakoff (1970). Linguistics and Natural Logic. Synthese 22 (1-2):151 - 271.
Ingvar Johansson (2013). Scattered Exemplification and Many-Place Copulas. Axiomathes 23 (2):235-246.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #234,650 of 556,807 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?