David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2):290 – 306 (1995)
Abstract An understanding of Descartes? concept of ?confusion? is important both for making sense of his epistemological enterprise and for grasping his doctrine of the union of mind and body. An analysis of Descartes? notion of confusion is offered which is grounded in the (more or less controversial) theses that confused thoughts are thoughts, that confusion is confusion by a thinker of one thought with another, and that confusion both can and should be avoided or ?undone?. This analysis takes its rise from his contrast between ?confused? and ?distinct? : it exhibits confusion as a failure to distinguish between meanings of systematically ambiguous expressions. This failure is sometimes due to ?bad intellectual habits? which in his view ought to be broken, sometimes to ?nature? (where the confusion is in general beneficial to our welfare). Paradigmatically these are expressions which refer ambiguously to substances (i.e. mind and body) which are ?really distinct?. Moreover, his ?disambiguations? indicate a central but neglected aspect of his aim in philosophizing: he can be seen as engaged in a moral project of ?philosophical therapy?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
René Descartes, Ch Adam & Paul Tannery (1982). Oeuvres de Descartes. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Richard Rorty (1981). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Philosophical Review 90 (3):424-429.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lori Gruen (2002). Refocusing Environmental Ethics: From Intrinsic Value to Endorsable Valuations. Philosophy and Geography 5 (2):153 – 164.
Stephen Puryear (2005). Was Leibniz Confused About Confusion? The Leibniz Review 15:95-124.
Susanne K. Langer (1926). Discussions: Confusion of Symbols and Confusion of Logical Types. Mind 35 (138):222-229.
Susanne K. Langer (1926). Confusion of Symbols and Confusion of Logical Types. Mind 35 (138):222-229.
B. C. Birchall (1978). Moral Life as the Obstacle to the Development of Ethical Theory. Inquiry 21 (1-4):409 – 424.
Imants Baruss (2008). Beliefs About Consciousness and Reality: Clarification of the Confusion Concerning Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (s 10-11):277-292.
John John Quay, Education, Experience, Existence: Seeking a Way Out of Educational Confusion Via a Coherent Theory of Experience and Curriculum in the Existential Philosophies of Dewey, Peirce and Heidegger.
James P. Moreland (2003). The Knowledge Argument Revisited. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):218-228.
Shaheen Borna & Gwendolen White (2003). "Sex" and "Gender": Two Confused and Confusing Concepts in the "Women in Corporate Management" Literature. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 47 (2):89 - 99.
Krista Lawlor (2007). A Notional Worlds Approach to Confusion. Mind and Language 22 (2):150–172.
Added to index2009-02-01
Total downloads4 ( #460,364 of 1,779,059 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,352 of 1,779,059 )
How can I increase my downloads?