David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2):265-291 (2008)
Phenomenology, understood as a philosophy of immanence, has had an ambiguous, uneasy relationship with transcendence, with the wholly other, with the numinous. If phenomenology restricts its evidence to givenness and to what has phenomenality, what becomes of that which is withheld or cannot in principle come to givenness? In this paper I examine attempts to acknowledge the transcendent in the writings of two phenomenologists, Edmund Husserl and Edith Stein (who attempted to fuse phenomenology with Neo-Thomism), and also consider the influence of the existentialist Karl Jaspers, who made transcendence an explicit theme of his writing. I argue that Husserl does recognize the essential experience of transcendence within immanence; even the idea of a physical thinghas “dimensions of infinity” included within it. Similarly, he asserts profoundly that every “outside” is what it is only as understood from the inside. Jaspers toomakes the experience of transcendence central to human existence; it is the very measure of my own depth. For Edith Stein, everything temporal points towardthe timeless structural ground which makes it what it is. Transcendence is an intrinsic part of being itself. Furthermore, the very lack of self-sufficiency of my own self shows that the self requires a ground outside itself, in the transcendent. There is strong convergence between the three thinkers studied on the concept of transcendence, which is indeed a central, if largely unacknowledged, concept in phenomenology both in Husserl and his followers (Stein), but also, throughJaspers, in Heidegger
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel W. Smith (2007). Deleuze and Derrida, Immanence and Transcendence. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 11:123-130.
Antonio Calcagno (2006). Assistant and/or Collaborator? Edith Stein's Relationship to Edmund Husserl's Ideen II. In Joyce Avrech Berkman (ed.), Contemplating Edith Stein: A Collection of Essays, pp. 243–270. University of Notre Dame Press
Joakim Sigvardson (2002). Immanence and Transcendence in Thomas Pynchon's Mason & Dixon: A Phenomenological Study. Almquist & Wiksell International.
Kristien Justaert (2007). “Ereignis” (Heidegger) or “La Clameur de l'Être” (Deleuze). Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):241-256.
Emerita Quito (2001). Phenomenology: Edmund Husserl and Edith Stein. De La Salle University Press.
Richard Feist & William Sweet (eds.) (2003). Husserl and Stein. The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Angela Ales Bello (2008). Edmund Husserl and Edith Stein: The Question of the Human Subject. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (1):143-159.
Angela Ales Bello (2008). Edmund Husserl and Edith Stein. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (1):143-159.
Bettina Bergo (2005). Ontology, Transcendence, and Immanence in Emmanuel Levinas' Philosophy. Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):141-180.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #106,433 of 1,934,933 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,780 of 1,934,933 )
How can I increase my downloads?