Meaning, Creativity, and the Partial Inscrutability of the Human Mind

Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Inf (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this book, Julius M. Moravcsik disputes that a natural language is not and should not be represented as a formal language. The book criticizes current philosophy of language as having an altered focus without adjusting the needed conceptual tools. It develops a new theory of lexical meaning, a new conception of cognition-humans not as information processing creatures but as primarily explanation and understanding seeking creatures-with information processing as a secondary, derivative activity. In conclusion, based on the theories of lexical meaning and cognition, this work sketches an argument showing that the human understanding of human understanding must always remain just partial

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Indeterminacy of Translation and the Inscrutability of Reference.Scott Soames - 1999 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):321-370.
Fodor on inscrutability.Jerome C. Wakefield - 2003 - Mind and Language 18 (5):524-537.
Spinoza on the Eternity of the Human Mind.Frank Lucash - 1990 - Philosophy and Theology 5 (2):103-113.
Creative action in mind.Peter Carruthers - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (4):437 - 461.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-20

Downloads
15 (#849,371)

6 months
8 (#209,681)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?