David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 182 (2):297-313 (2011)
Traditional representations of philosophy have tended to prize the role of reason in the discipline. These accounts focus exclusively on ideas and arguments as animating forces in the field. But anecdotal evidence and more rigorous sociological studies suggest there is more going on in philosophy. In this article, we present two hypotheses about social factors in the field: that social factors influence the development of philosophy, and that status and reputation—and thus social influence—will tend to be awarded to philosophers who offer rationally compelling arguments for their views. In order to test these hypotheses, we need a more comprehensive grasp on the field than traditional representations afford. In particular, we need more substantial data about various social connections between philosophers. This investigation belongs to a naturalized metaphilosophy, an empirical study of the discipline itself, and it offers prospects for a fuller and more reliable understanding of philosophy
|Keywords||Philosophy Sociology Networks Reason Naturalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Philip Kitcher (1993). The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford University Press.
Evelyn Fox Keller (1996). Reflections on Gender and Science. Yale University Press.
David Bloor (1991). Knowledge and Social Imagery. University of Chicago Press.
Hilary Putnam (1978). Meaning and the Moral Sciences. Routledge & K. Paul.
David Zaret (1977). The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 90 (1):146-149.
Citations of this work BETA
Anthony F. Beavers (2011). Noesis and the Encyclopedic Internet Vision. Synthese 182 (2):315 - 333.
Bob Plant (2012). Philosophical Diversity and Disagreement. Metaphilosophy 43 (5):567-591.
Similar books and articles
Hangqing Cong & Xiaodong Cheng (2006). Pragmatic Commitments to Naturalized Epistemology. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):477-490.
Yuri Cath, Metaphilosophy. Oxford Bibliographies Online.
David Henderson (2010). Explanation and Rationality Naturalized. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (1):30-58.
Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.) (2010). Oxford Studies in Epistemology Volume 3. OUP Oxford.
David Stump (1992). Naturalized Philosophy of Science with a Plurality of Methods. Philosophy of Science 59 (3):456-460.
David B. Annis (1982). Epistemology Naturalized. Metaphilosophy 13 (3-4):201-208.
Harvey Siegel (1995). Naturalized Epistemology and ?First Philosophy? Metaphilosophy 26 (1-2):46-62.
Laurie Shrage (2008). Will Philosophers Study Their History, Or Become History? Radical Philosophy Review 11 (2):125-150.
Added to index2009-10-03
Total downloads69 ( #49,355 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #66,646 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?