New Perspectives on the Study of the Authority Relationship: Integrating Individual and Societal Level Research

Abstract
The concept of authority crosses many social sciences, but there is a lack of common taxonomy and definitions on this topic. The aims of this review are: to define the basic characteristics of the authority relationship, reaching a definition suitable for the different domains of social psychology and social sciences; to bridge the gap between individual and societal levels of explanation concerning the authority relationship, by proposing an interpretation within the framework of social representations. The authority relationship can be conceived as a negotiation of meanings and it is closely linked to shared value orientation and the attribution of meanings negotiated within a society. We assume that the authority relationship is socially constructed and represents both a shared representation of society and a normative principle of social life. A multidisciplinary approach is adopted, crossing definitions and studies provided in sociology, political science, law and social psychology
Keywords Authority  Obedience  Social Change  Social Representations  Democracy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,703
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Christiano (2004). The Authority of Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (3):266–290.
Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Thomas Hove (2009). Social Laws of Competition for Journalistic Authority. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 24 (2 & 3):164 – 172.
Linda Zagzebski (2010). The Rule of St. Benedict and Modern Liberal Authority. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):65 - 84.
B. Roermund (2000). Authority and Authorisation. Law and Philosophy 19 (2):201-222.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-02-17

Total downloads

25 ( #77,774 of 1,413,179 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #153,719 of 1,413,179 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.