David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philo 4 (1):7-20 (2001)
Can God be both omnipotent and essentially good? Working with the Anselmian conception of God as the greatest possible being, a number of philosophers have tried to show that omnipotence should be understood in such a way that these properties are compatible. In the present paper, I argue that we can, without inconsistency or other obvious absurdity, conceive of a being more powerful than the Anselmian God. I conclude that contemporary Anselmian philosophers have conflated two logically distinct questions: (1) How much power would be possessed by the best possible God? and (2) How much power is required for omnipotence? When these questions are distinguished, it can be seen that the Anselmian God does not have maximal power and is not omnipotent
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Yujin Nagasawa (2008). A New Defence of Anselmian Theism. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):577-596.
Paul Tidman (1993). The Epistemology of Evil Possibilities. Faith and Philosophy 10 (2):181-197.
Klaas J. Kraay (2011). Incommensurability, Incomparability, and God's Choice of a World. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):91 - 102.
Jesse R. Steinberg (2007). Concerning the Preservation of God's Omnipotence. Sophia 46 (1):1-5.
Stephen Maitzen (2005). Anselmian Atheism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):225–239.
Thomas Metcalf (2004). Omniscience and Maximal Power. Religious Studies 40 (3):289-306.
Katherin A. Rogers (2007). Anselmian Eternalism: The Presence of a Timeless God. Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):3-27.
Eric Funkhouser (2006). On Privileging God's Moral Goodness. Faith and Philosophy 23 (4):409-422.
Erik Wielenberg (2000). Omnipotence Again. Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):26-47.
Wes Morriston (2001). Omnipotence and Necessary Moral Perfection: Are They Compatible? Religious Studies 37 (2):143-160.
Katherin A. Rogers (2007). Anselmian Eternalism. Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):3-27.
Einar Duenger Bohn (2012). Anselmian Theism and Indefinitely Extensible Perfection. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):671-683.
Richard Swinburne (2009). How the Divine Properties Fit Together: Reply to Gwiazda. Religious Studies 45 (4):495-498.
Wes Morriston (2003). Are Omnipotence and Necessary Moral Perfection Compatible? Reply to Mawson. Religious Studies 39 (4):441-449.
Added to index2011-02-24
Total downloads9 ( #157,093 of 1,101,021 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #177,033 of 1,101,021 )
How can I increase my downloads?