Questioning Feminine Connection
Hypatia 12 (2):140 - 151 (1997)
| Abstract | This paper examines Nancy Chodorow's theory of feminine connection and masculine separation in The Reproduction of Mothering. First it demonstrates that, contrary to many feminists' interpretations, Chodorow's theory does not portray masculine separation as a social problem to which feminine connection is the solution. Then it shows that Chodorow's apparently intended theory is incoherent. Finally, it argues that Chodorow's claims imply another theory that is coherent and that deserves feminists' attention | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCecilia Wee (2003). Mencius, the Feminine Perspective and Impartiality. Asian Philosophy 13 (1):3 – 13.
John W. Cooper (2000). Supplemental but Not Equal. Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):116-125.
Tina Chanter (2001). Time, Death, and the Feminine: Levinas with Heidegger. Stanford University Press.
Ismay Barwell (1990). Feminine Perspectives and Narrative Points of View. Hypatia 5 (2):63 - 75.
Daniel O. Dugan (1987). Masculine and Feminine Voices: Making Ethical Decisions in the Care of the Dying. Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 8 (2):129-140.
Mary C. Rawlinson (1982). Psychiatric Discourse and the Feminine Voice. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (2):153-178.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads3 ( #202,008 of 549,128 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
