David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 18 (1):39-54 (1996)
Despite growing awareness of its various problems, private automobile use is still seen as an inviolable individual freedom. We consider the ethical arguments for and against private automobile use with particular reference to John Stuart Mill’s theory of freedom. There is much evidence to show that private automobile use is an other-regarding harmful activity that is, therefore, on Mill’s terms, liable to public control. Although it cannot be an entirely self-regarding activity, we consider private automobile use in this category and argue that even on Mill’s terms it can properly be subjected to extensive control. We also challenge Mill’s theory and argue that private automobile use lacks adequate moral justification. We then consider the policy implications of this ethical argument and review some of the policy options available. We conclude that although an immediate total ban on private automobile use is justifiable, it is inadvisable at this time and that more limited, but effective control should be implemented in preparation for a total ban
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Julia Meaton & David Morrice (1996). The Ethics and Politics of Private Automobile Use. Environmental Ethics 18 (1):39-54.
Robert L. Brown, Darren Charters, Sally Gunz & Neil Haddow (2007). Colliding Interests – Age as an Automobile Insurance Rating Variable: Equitable Rate-Making or Unfair Discrimination? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 72 (2):103 - 114.
Martin Calkins (2009). King Car and the Ethics of Automobile Proponents' Strategies in China. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (1):157 - 172.
Earl D. Honeycutt, Myron Glassman, Michael T. Zugelder & Kiran Karande (2001). Determinants of Ethical Behavior: A Study of Autosalespeople. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 32 (1):69 - 79.
Kevin Morrell & Ian Clark (2010). Private Equity and the Public Good. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (2):249 - 263.
Antonio Argandoña (2003). Private-to-Private Corruption. Journal of Business Ethics 47 (3):253 - 267.
Zhilong Tian, Haitao Gao & Malcolm Cone (2008). A Study of the Ethical Issues of Private Entrepreneurs Participating in Politics in China. Journal of Business Ethics 80 (3):627 - 642.
David Bain (2004). Private Languages and Private Theorists. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):427 - 434.
John A. Humphrey (1996). Kripke's Wittgenstein and the Impossibility of Private Language: The Same Old Story? Journal of Philosophical Research 21 (January):197-207.
Stephen Nathanson (2005). John Stuart Mill on the Ownership and Use of Land. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):10-16.
Douglas A. Houston & John S. Howe (1987). The Ethics of Going Private. Journal of Business Ethics 6 (7):519 - 525.
Kenneth Sayre (1981). Morality, Energy, and the Environment. Environmental Ethics 3 (1):5-18.
Dale Jacquette (1994). Wittgenstein on Private Language and Privat Mental Objects. Wittgenstein Studien 1 (1).
David B. Resnik (2003). Strengthening the United States' Database Protection Laws: Balancing Public Access and Private Control. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):301-318.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads10 ( #156,919 of 1,140,105 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #147,976 of 1,140,105 )
How can I increase my downloads?