David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Continental Philosophy Review 43 (2):141-165 (2010)
This article clarifies Merleau-Ponty’s enigmatic, later concept of reversibility by showing how it is connected to the theme of the genesis of sense. The article first traces reversibility through “Eye and Mind” and The Visible and the Invisible , in ways that link reversibility to a theme of the earlier philosophy, namely an interrelation in which activity and passivity reverse to one another. This linkage is deepened through a detailed study of a passage on touch in the Phenomenology ’s chapter on “Sensing,” which shows how reversibility is important to the genesis of sense, not from some already given origin, but through a creative operation within being, beyond the perceiver, wherein the field of perception internally diverges into active and passive moments. The article connects this point about the genesis of sense to themes in Merleau-Ponty’s lectures on institution and passivity. Altogether the article shows how reversibility is a sign of a divergence and thence of a sort of gap or excess in being that allows for a genesis of sense within being itself
|Keywords||Merleau-Ponty Phenomenology Reversibility Genesis of sense Meaning Touch Activity Passivity Institution|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Luce Irigaray (1993). An Ethics of Sexual Difference. Cornell University Press.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1968). The Visible and the Invisible. Northwestern University Press.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1964). Signs. Northwestern University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Whitney Howell (2015). Learning and the Development of Meaning: Husserl and Merleau-Ponty on the Temporality of Perception and Habit. Southern Journal of Philosophy 53 (3):311-337.
Similar books and articles
David Grandy (2006). Merleau-Ponty's Visual Space and the Law of Large Numbers. Studia Phaenomenologica 6 (1):391-406.
Alia Al-Saji (2006). Vision, Mirror and Expression: The Genesis of the Ethical Body in Merleau-Ponty’s Later Works. In James Hatley, Janice McLane & Christian Diehm (eds.), Interrogating Ethics: Embodying the Good in Merleau-Ponty. Duquesne University Press
Glen Mazis (2004). Deep Ecology, The Reversibility of the Flesh of the World and the Poetic Word. Environmental Philosophy 1 (2):46-61.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1964). Sense and Non-Sense. Northwestern University Press.
Rajiv Kaushik (2008). Architectonic and Myth Time. Studia Phaenomenologica 8:121-139.
David Morris (2008). Body. In Rosalyn Diprose & Jack Reynolds (eds.), Merleau-ponty: Key Concepts. Acumen Publishing 111-120.
Harry Adams (2001). Merleau-Ponty and the Advent of Meaning: From Consummate Reciprocity to Ambiguous Reversibility. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 34 (2):203-224.
David Morris (2008). The Time and Place of the Organism: Merleau-Ponty's Philosophy in Embryo. Alter: revue de phénoménologie 16:69-86.
Glen Mazis (1992). Merleau-Ponty and the Backward Flow of Time: The Reversibility of Temporality and the Temporality of Reversibility. In Shaun Gallagher Thomas Busch (ed.), Merleau-Ponty, Hermeneutics and Postmodernism.
David Morris (2008). Reversibility and Ereignis: On Being as Kantian Imagination in Merleau-Ponty and Heidegger. Philosophy Today 52 (Supplement):135-143.
Added to index2010-07-03
Total downloads60 ( #73,485 of 1,911,519 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #61,051 of 1,911,519 )
How can I increase my downloads?