|Abstract||The general aim of this paper is to introduce some ideas of the theory of infinite topological games into the philosophical debate on supertasks. First, we discuss the elementary aspects of some infinite topological games, among them the Banach-Mazur game.Then it is shown that the Banach-Mazur game may be conceived as a Newtonian supertask.In section 4 we propose to conceive physical experiments as infinite games. This leads to the distinction between determined and undetermined experiments and the problem of how it is related to that between determinism and indeter-minism. Finally the role of the Axiom of Choice as a source of indetermi-nacy of supertasks is discussed.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
John Norton (2000). What Is a Newtonian System? The Failure of Energy Conservation and Determinism in Supertasks. Synthese 124 (2):281 - 293.
Johan Van Benthem (2003). Logic Games Are Complete for Game Logics. Studia Logica 75 (2):183 - 203.
Johan van Benthem (2003). Logic Games Are Complete for Game Logics. Studia Logica 75 (2).
Robert S. Wolf (1985). Determinateness of Certain Almost-Borel Games. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (3):569-579.
Joseph S. Alper & Mark Bridger (1998). Newtonian Supertasks: A Critical Analysis. Synthese 114 (2):355-369.
Jon Pérez Laaraudogoitia, Mark Bridger & Joseph S. Alper (2002). Two Ways of Looking at a Newtonian Supertask. Synthese 131 (2):173 - 189.
Chris Freiling (1984). Banach Games. Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (2):343-375.
Added to index2010-04-09
Total downloads53 ( #19,306 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #4,933 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?