Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (4):447 - 464 (2009)
|Abstract||The hypothetical syllogism is invalid in standard interpretations of conditional sentences. Many arguments of this sort are quite compelling, though, and you can wonder what makes them so. I shall argue that it is our parsimony in regard to connections among events and states of affairs. All manner of things just might, for all we know, be bound up with one another in all sorts of ways. But ordinarily it is better, being simpler, to assume they are unconnected. In so doing, we jump to the conclusions of some compelling but invalid arguments.|
|Keywords||Conditionals Induction Parsimony Preferential reasoning|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alan Hájek (2009). Fifteen Arguments Against Hypothetical Frequentism. Erkenntnis 70 (2):211 - 235.
Stanley Wilcox (1939). The Destructive Hypothetical Syllogism in Greek Logic and in Attic Oratory. [New Haven.
Susanne Bobzien (1997). The Stoics on Hypotheses and Hypothetical Arguments. Phronesis 42 (3):299-312.
D. L. C. Maclachlan (1970). The Pure Hypothetical Syllogism and Entailment. Philosophical Quarterly 20 (78):26-40.
Maroun Aouad & Gregor Schoeler (2002). The Poetic Syllogism According to Al-Farabi: An Incorrect Syllogism of the Second Figure. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 12 (2):185-196.
John R. Welch (1991). Reconstructing Aristotle: The Practical Syllogism. Philosophia 21 (1-2):69-88.
J. Tate (1940). Stanley Wilcox: The Destructive Hypothetical Syllogism in Greek Logic and in Attic Oratory. Pp. 143. (Yale Dissertation, Photo-Copy of Typescript) 1938. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 54 (02):113-114.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads96 ( #8,556 of 739,851 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,851 )
How can I increase my downloads?