Graduate studies at Western
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1):1–18 (1999)
|Abstract||I argue that both demonstratives and vague predicates are instances of some more general linguistic phenomena, which could take quite different forms. My argument consists in constructing three natural-like langauges, and using their intelligibility to argue for conclusions about languages such as English.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lynsey Wolter (2009). Demonstratives in Philosophy and Linguistics. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):451-468.
Roy T. Cook (2002). Vagueness and Mathematical Precision. Mind 111 (442):225-247.
Erkki Ahlström (2009). Reference and Complex Demonstratives in English and in Finnish. In Dingfang Shu & Ken Turner (eds.), Contrasting Meanings in Languages of the East and West. Peter Lang.
Jeffrey C. King (2008). Complex Demonstratives as Quantifiers: Objections and Replies. Philosophical Studies 141 (2):209 - 242.
David Braun (1996). Demonstratives and Their Linguistic Meanings. Noûs 30 (2):145-173.
Stewart Shapiro (2006/2008). Vagueness in Context. Oxford University Press.
Adam Morton (1999). The Presidential Address: Where Demonstratives Meet Vagueness: Possible Languages. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99:1 - 18.
John Collins (2000). Unsharpenable Vagueness. Philosophical Topics 28 (1):1-10.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,460 of 751,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,163 of 751,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?