Was Husserl a nominalist?
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (4):661-674 (1989)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBarry Smith (1986). Ontologische Aspekte der Husserlschen Phänomenologie. Husserl Studies 3 (2).
Sebastian Luft (2005). Husserl's Concept of the 'Transcendental Person': Another Look at the Husserl-Heidegger Relationship. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (2):141 – 177.
Matti Eklund (2008). The Picture of Reality as an Amorphous Lump. In Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Blackwell Pub..
Howard Peacock (2009). What's Wrong with Ostrich Nominalism? Philosophical Papers 38 (2):183-217.
Otavio Bueno (2010). Logicism Revisited. Principia 5 (1-2):99-124.
R. O. Elveton (1970). The Phenomenology of Husserl. Chicago,Quadrangle Books.
Paul Ricœur (1967/2007). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Otávio Bueno & Edward N. Zalta (2005). A Nominalist's Dilemma and its Solution. Philosophia Mathematica 13 (3):297-307.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads23 ( #53,914 of 549,591 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,591 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
