David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio Juris 25 (1):31-46 (2012)
This paper deals with the question of the conflict of constitutional rights with regard to basic rights. Two extreme accounts are outlined: the subsumptive approach and the particularistic approach, that embody two main conceptions of practical rationality. Between the two approaches there is room for a range of options, two of which are examined: the proportionalist approach, which conserves the scope of rights restricting their stringency, and the specificationist approach, which preserves the stringency of rights restricting their scope. I will present arguments in defence of the latter
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Alexy (2003). Constitutional Rights, Balancing, and Rationality. Ratio Juris 16 (2):131-140.
Robert Alexy (2003). On Balancing and Subsumption. A Structural Comparison. Ratio Juris 16 (4):433-449.
Jonathan Dancy (2004). Ethics Without Principles. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan Dancy (1993). Moral Reasons. Blackwell.
Citations of this work BETA
Giorgio Pino (2014). Positivism, Legal Validity, and the Separation of Law and Morals. Ratio Juris 27 (2):190-217.
Similar books and articles
John Oberdiek (2008). Specifying Rights Out of Necessity. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (1):19.
Lorenzo Zucca (2007). Constitutional Dilemmas: Conflicts of Fundamental Legal Rights in Europe and the USA. OUP Oxford.
David Martinez-Zorrilla (2011). The Structure of Conflicts of Fundamental Legal Rights. Law and Philosophy 30 (6):729-749.
Katherine Eddy (2006). Welfare Rights and Conflicts of Rights. Res Publica 12 (4):337-356.
Andrew Botterell (2008). In Defence of Infringement. Law and Philosophy 27 (3):269-292.
John Oberdiek (2010). Specifying Constitutional Rights. Constitutional Commentary 271 (1).
Rex Martin (2006). Human Rights. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:175-181.
Charles-Maxime Panaccio (2010). Review of G.C.N. Webber, The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2009). [REVIEW] International Journal of Constitutional Law 8 (4):988-995.
Manuel Toscano (2012). Language Rights as Collective Rights: Some Conceptual Considerations on Language Rights. Res Publica 27:109-118.
Added to index2012-02-23
Total downloads64 ( #36,359 of 1,699,706 )
Recent downloads (6 months)54 ( #5,919 of 1,699,706 )
How can I increase my downloads?