A review of qualitative methodologies used to explore patient perceptions of arts and healthcare [Book Review]
Medical Humanities 38 (2):106-109 (2012)
|Abstract||Although the importance of the arts in healthcare is increasingly recognised, further research is needed to investigate the mechanisms by which arts and health programmes achieve their impact. An overview of the qualitative methods used to explore patients' perceptions of these interventions is lacking. We reviewed the literature to gain insights into the qualitative methods used to explore patients' perceptions of the role of arts in healthcare with a view to identifying the most common methodologies used and to guide researchers embarking on research regarding patients' perceptions of arts in healthcare. Our results indicate a paucity of qualitative studies, a variety of methods used and variability of methodological rigour. Grounded theory and phenomenology were the most common approaches adopted, mixed methods approaches were relatively frequent, and versions of ‘thematic’ or ‘content’ analysis were commonly cited. Semi-structured interviews were the most popular data collection method. The emphasis of all of the studies was on active or participative arts engagement, with no focus on receptive engagement with the arts and aesthetics. It was concluded that careful consideration of appropriate methodology is important when researching such an exploratory and sensitive area. Individual interviews were most popular and might be appropriate when exploring personal, sensitive experiences. Mixed method studies possibly provide a comprehensive approach which might satisfy both the arts and healthcare settings need for evidence. It seems important to pay attention to rigour in any methodology chosen and a greater focus on receptive engagement with the arts might be encouraged in future research|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tamara Kohn & Rosemary McKechnie (eds.) (1999). Extending the Boundaries of Care: Medical Ethics and Caring Practices. Berg.
Eric Racine (2008). Enriching Our Views on Clinical Ethics: Results of a Qualitative Study of the Moral Psychology of Healthcare Ethics Committee Members. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (1):57-67.
Terry E. Hill (2010). How Clinicians Make (or Avoid) Moral Judgments of Patients: Implications of the Evidence for Relationships and Research. [REVIEW] Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 5 (1):11.
R. S. Downie (2007). Bioethics and the Humanities: Attitudes and Perceptions. Routledge-Cavendish.
Roberto Festa (2007). Verisimilitude, Cross Classification and Prediction Logic. Approaching the Statistical Truth by Falsified Qualitative Theories. Mind and Society 6 (1):91-114.
Katrina A. Bramstedt (2002). Patient Productivity as a Value and a Variable in Geriatric Healthcare Allocation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (1):94-96.
Jaklin Eliott & Ian Olver (2008). Choosing Between Life and Death: Patient and Family Perceptions of the Decision Not to Resuscitate the Terminally Ill Cancer Patient. Bioethics 22 (3):179–189.
Rosamond Rhodes (1995). Love Thy Patient: Justice, Caring, and the Doctor–Patient Relationship. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (04):434-.
James F. Drane (1991). The Patient Self-Determination ACT (PSDA) and the Incapacitated Patient: Policy Suggestions for Healthcare Ethics Committees. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 3 (6):309-320.
Howard Brody (2005). Patient Ethics and Evidence-Based Medicine—The Good Healthcare Citizen. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (02):141-146.
James A. H. S. Hine & Lutz Preuss (2009). “Society is Out There, Organisation is in Here”: On the Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Held by Different Managerial Groups. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (2):381 - 393.
Tolga Guven & Gurkan Sert (2010). Advance Directives in Turkey's Cultural Context: Examining the Potential Benefits for the Implementation of Patient Rights. Bioethics 24 (3):127-133.
Adalberto de Hoyos, Rodrigo Nava-Diosdado, Jorge Mendez, Sergio Ricco, Ana Serrano, Carmen Flores Cisneros, Carlos Macías-Ojeda, Héctor Cisneros, David Bialostozky, Nelly Altamirano-Bustamante & Myriam Altamirano-Bustamante (2013). Cardiovascular Medicine at Face Value: A Qualitative Pilot Study on Clinical Axiology. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 8 (1):3.
Kirsten Schou, Herdis Alvsvåg, Gunnhild Blåka & Eva Gjengedal (2008). The (Dis)Appearance of the Dying Patient in Generalist Hospital and Care Home Nurses' Talk About the Patient. Nursing Philosophy 9 (4):233-247.
Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé, Mieke Grypdonck, Nancy Cannaerts & Els Steeman (2004). Empirical Ethics in Action: Lessons From Two Empirical Studies in Nursing Ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):31-39.
Added to index2012-08-15
Total downloads3 ( #213,130 of 722,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?