Becker random behavior and the as-if defense of rational choice theory in demand analysis
Journal of Economic Methodology 18 (2):107-128 (2011)
| Abstract | In discussing rational choice theory (RCT) as an explanation of demand behavior, Becker (1962, Journal of Political Economy, 70, 1?13) proposed a model of random choice in which consumers pick a bundle on their budget line according to a uniform distribution. This model has then been used in various ways to assess the validity of RCT and to support as-if arguments in defense of it. This paper makes both historical and methodological contributions. Historically, it investigates how the interpretation of Becker random behavior evolved between the original 1962 article and the modern experimental literature on individual demand, and surveys six experiments in which it has been used as an alternative hypothesis to RCT. Methodologically, this paper conducts an assessment of the as-if defense of RCT from the standpoint of Becker's model. It argues that this defense is ?weak? in a number of senses, and that it has negatively influenced the design of experiments about RCT. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHÉlÈne Landemore (2004). Politics and the Economist-King: Is Rational Choice Theory the Science of Choice? Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (2):177-196.
Kevin Morrell (2004). Decision Making and Business Ethics: The Implications of Using Image Theory in Preference to Rational Choice. Journal of Business Ethics 50 (3):239-252.
Alban Bouvier (2002). An Epistemological Plea for Methodological Individualism and Rational Choice Theory in Cognitive Rhetoric. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (1):51-70.
Paola Modesti (2003). Lottery-Dependent Utility Via Stochastic Benchmarking. Theory and Decision 55 (1):45-57.
Michael Taylor (1995). Battering RAMs. Critical Review 9 (1-2):223-234.
Robert E. Lane (1995). What Rational Choice Explains. Critical Review 9 (1-2):107-126.
S. Phineas Upham (2005). Is Economics Scientific? Is Science Scientific? Critical Review 17 (1-2):117-132.
Peter Stone (2003). The Impossibility of Rational Politics? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (2):239-263.
Kaisa Herne & Maija Setälä (2004). A Response to the Critique of Rational Choice Theory: Lakatos' and Laudan's Conceptions Applied. Inquiry 47 (1):67 – 85.
Paola Tubaro (2009). Is Individual Rationality Essential to Market Price Formation? The Contribution of Zero‐Intelligence Agent Trading Models. Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (1):1-19.
Stanley Kelley (1995). The Promise and Limitations of Rational Choice Theory. Critical Review 9 (1-2):95-106.
S. E. N. Amartya (2005). Why Exactly is Commitment Important for Rationality? Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):5-14.
Stuart Rachels (2009). On Three Alleged Theories of Rational Behavior. Utilitas 21 (4):506-520.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2012-02-20Total downloads1 ( #274,982 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
