Graduate studies at Western
Philosophia 37 (1):1-20 (2009)
|Abstract||Kant’s reputation for making absolutist claims about universal and necessary conditions for the possibility of experience are put here in the broader context of his goals for the Critical philosophy. It is shown that within that context, Kant’s claims can be seen as considerably more innocuous than they are traditionally regarded, underscoring his deep respect for “common sense” and sharing surprisingly similar goals with Wittgenstein in terms of what philosophy can, and at least as importantly cannot, provide.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael De Medeiros (2010). Common Sense. Weigl Publishers.
Patricia Kitcher (2000). On Interpreting Kant's Thinker as Wittgenstein's 'I'. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):33-63.
Etienne Brun-Rovet (2002). Reid, Kant and the Philosophy of Mind. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):495-510.
Paul Livingston (2007). Wittgenstein, Kant and the Critique of Totality. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):691-715.
Vasilis Politis (1997). The Apriority of the Starting-Point of Kant's Transcendental Epistemology. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):255 – 284.
Monique David-Ménard & Alison Ross (2000). Kant's "An Essay on the Maladies of the Mind" and Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime. Hypatia 15 (4):82 - 98.
Patrick McGee (2009). Theory and the Common From Marx to Badiou. Palgrave Macmillan.
David Thomas (1978). Sociology and Common Sense. Inquiry 21 (1-4):1 – 32.
Brian Grant (2001). The Virtues of Common Sense. Philosophy 76 (2):191-209.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #38,159 of 738,504 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,464 of 738,504 )
How can I increase my downloads?