|Abstract||Economists tend to represent learning as a procedure for estimating the parameters of the "correct" econometric model. We extend this approach by assuming that agents specify as well as estimate models. Learning thus takes the form of a dynamic process of developing models using an internal language of representation where expectations are formed by forecasting with the best current model. This introduces a distinction between the form and content of the internal models which is particularly relevant for boundedly rational agents. We propose a framework for such model development which use a combination of measures: the error with respect to past data, the complexity of the model, the cost of finding the model and a measure of the model's specificity The agent has to make various trade-offs between them. A utility learning agent is given as an example.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bruce Edmonds, Gossip, Sexual Recombination and the El Farol Bar: Modelling the Emergence of Heterogeneity.
Daniela Bailer-Jones (2000). Modelling Extended Extragalactic Radio Sources. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 31 (1):49-74.
Tarja Knuuttila (2011). Modelling and Representing: An Artefactual Approach to Model-Based Representation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (2):262-271.
Paisley Livingston (1994). What is Mimetic Desire? Philosophical Psychology 7 (3):291 – 305.
Edward Merrillb & Todd Petersonb (2001). From Implicit Skills to Explicit Knowledge: A Bottom‐Up Model of Skill Learning. Cognitive Science 25 (2):203-244.
Bruce Edmonds (2000). Complexity and Scientific Modelling. Foundations of Science 5 (3):379-390.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #245,513 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?