David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1993)
Since the beginning of philosophy, philosophers have sought objective knowledge: knowledge of things whose existence does not depend on one's conceiving of them. This book uses lessons from debates over objective knowledge to characterize the kinds of reasons pertinent to philosophical and other theoretical views. It argues that we cannot meet skeptics' typical demands for nonquestion-begging support for claims to objective truth, and that therefore we should not regard our supporting reasons as resistant to skeptical challenges. One key lesson is that a constructive, explanatory approach to philosophy must change the subject from skeptic-resistant reasons to perspectival reasons arising from variable semantic commitments and instrumental, purpose-relative considerations. The book lays foundations for such a reorientation of philosophy, treating fundamental methodological issues in ontology, epistemology, the theory of meaning, the philosophy of mind, and the theory of practical rationality. It explains how certain perennial debates in philosophy rest not on genuine disagreement, but on conceptual diversity: talk about different matters. The book shows how acknowledgment of conceptual diversity can resolve a range of traditional disputes in philosophy. It also explains why philosophers need not anchor their discipline in the physicalism of the natural sciences.
|Keywords||Objectivity Realism Relativity Perspective (Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$2.80 used (98% off) $70.05 new (47% off) $73.92 direct from Amazon (44% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BD220.M67 1993|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
James Beebe (2009). The Abductivist Reply to Skepticism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (3):605 - 636.
Michael P. Lynch (1999). Relativity of Fact and Content. Southern Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):579-595.
James R. Beebe (2009). The Abductivist Reply to Skepticism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (3):605-636.
Merold Westphal (2014). Must Phenomenology and Theology Make Two? A Response to Trakakis and Simmons. Heythrop Journal 55 (4):711-717.
Robert P. Amico (2003). Is a Fully General Theory of Knowledge Possible? Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):307-322.
Similar books and articles
B. D. Ellis (1990). Truth and Objectivity. Basil Blackwell.
Mari Mikkola (2010). Is Everything Relative? Anti-Realism, Truth and Feminism. In A. Hazlett (ed.), New Waves in Metaphysics.
Lorraine Daston (2007). Objectivity. Distributed by the MIT Press.
Kent W. Staley (2005). Agency and Objectivity in the Search for the Top Qjjark. In P. Achinstein (ed.), Scientific Evidence: Philosophical Theories & Applications. The Johns Hopkins University Press
R. Lanier Anderson (1998). Truth and Objectivity in Perspectivism. Synthese 115 (1):1-32.
Rebecca Kukla (2006). Objectivity and Perspective in Empirical Knowledge. Episteme 3 (1-2):80-95.
Brian Leiter (ed.) (2001). Objectivity in Law and Morals. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Artin Boghossian (2006). Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. Oxford University Press.
Jean Hampton (1998). The Authority of Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #116,841 of 1,699,699 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,699,699 )
How can I increase my downloads?