Graduate studies at Western
Biology and Philosophy 28 (1):53-74 (2013)
|Abstract||In this paper I use a case study—the discovery of the chaperon function exerted by proteins in the various steps of the hereditary process—to re-discuss the question whether the nucleic acids are the sole repositories of relevant information as assumed in the information theory of heredity. The evidence I here present of a crucial role for molecular chaperones in the folding of nascent proteins, as well as in DNA duplication, RNA folding and gene control, suggests that the family of proteins acting as molecular chaperones provides information that is complementary to that stored in the nucleic acids, and equally important. A re-evaluation of the role of proteins in the hereditary process is in order away from the gene-centric approach of the information theory of heredity, to which neo-Darwinian evolutionists adhere|
|Keywords||Molecular chaperones Heredity Protein folding Genes Neo-Darwinian thinking Molecular biology Cell biology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sergey N. Rumyantsev (1997). Chemical Ecology and Biomolecular Evolution. Acta Biotheoretica 45 (1).
J. P. Liautard (1999). Analytical Background and Discussion of the Chaperone Model of Prion Diseases. Acta Biotheoretica 47 (3-4).
Predrag Sustar (2007). Crick's Notion of Genetic Information and the ‘Central Dogma’ of Molecular Biology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (1):13-24.
Predrag Šustar (2007). Crick's Notion of Genetic Information and the 'Central Dogma' of Molecular Biology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (1):13 - 24.
Laura Nuño de la Rosa & Fernando M. Pérez Herranz (2009). The Problem of Form in Molecular Biology. In José Luis González Recio (ed.), Philosophical Essays on Physics and Biology.
Martin Carrier & Patrick Finzer (2006). Explanatory Loops and the Limits of Genetic Reductionism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):267 – 283.
John R. Jungck (1982). Is the Neo-Darwinian Synthesis Robust Enough to Withstand the Challenge of Recent Discoveries in Molecular Biology and Molecular Evolution? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:322 - 328.
Jing Huang & Feng Shi (2005). Support Vector Machines for Predicting Apoptosis Proteins Types. Acta Biotheoretica 53 (1).
Paul Erbrich (1985). On the Probability of the Emergence of a Protein with a Particular Function. Acta Biotheoretica 34 (1).
James Maclaurin (1998). Reinventing Molecular Weismannism: Information in Evolution. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 13 (1):37-59.
C. Kenneth Waters (1994). Genes Made Molecular. Philosophy of Science 61 (2):163-185.
Alejandro Balbín & Eugenio Andrade (2004). Protein Folding and Evolution Are Driven by the Maxwell Demon Activity of Proteins. Acta Biotheoretica 52 (3).
Philip Kitcher (2002). On the Explanatory Role of Correspondence Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):346-364.
Lenny Moss (2006). The Question of Questions: What is a Gene? Comments on Rolston and Griffths & Stotz. [REVIEW] Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (6):523-534.
Added to index2012-07-20
Total downloads9 ( #122,430 of 722,947 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,947 )
How can I increase my downloads?