Science, normativity and skill: Reviewing and renewing the anthropological basis of Critical Theory
Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (2):139-165 (2011)
| Abstract | The categories and contours of a normative social theory are prefigured by its ‘anthropological’ presuppositions. The discourse/communicative-theoretic basis of Habermasian theory was prefigured by a strong anthropological demarcation between an instrumentally structured realm of science, technology and labor versus a normatively structured realm of social interaction. An alternative anthropology, bolstered by current work in the empirical sciences, finds fundamental normative needs for orientation and ‘compensation’ also to be embedded in embodied material practices. An emerging anthropologically informed concept of skill that goes beyond old manual versus intellectual dichotomies and brings forth internal criteria of autonomy and authenticity can serve as a new bridge between categories of social justice, such as Sen and Nussbaum’s basic human ‘capabilities’, and new cutting-edge work in the empirical human sciences and thereby provide Critical Theory with a renewed point of departure that is both normatively and descriptively rich, for advancing its dialectical, historical mission | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJean-Philippe Deranty (2006). Repressed Materiality: Retrieving the Materialism in Axel Honneth's Theory of Recognition. Critical Horizons 7 (1):113-140.
James William Lett (1987). The Human Enterprise: A Critical Introduction to Anthropological Theory. Westview Press.
Jordy Rocheleau (2001). Communication, Recognition and Politics. Social Philosophy Today 17:253-263.
Nikolas Kompridis (2004). From Reason to Self-Realisation? Axel Honneth and the 'Ethical Turn' in Critical Theory. Critical Horizons 5 (1):323-360.
Wim J. M. Dekkers (1995). F.J.J. Buytendijk's Concept of an Anthropological Physiology. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (1).
Daniel Little (1991). Varieties of Social Explanation: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Science. Westview Press.
Neil Fligstein (2001). Social Skill and the Theory of Fields. Sociological Theory 19 (2):105-125.
I. C. Jarvie (1984). Anthropology as Science and the Anthropology of Science and of Anthropology or Understanding and Explanation in the Social Sciences, Part II. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:745 - 763.
Mark Risjord (2004). The Limits of Cognitive Theory in Anthropology. Philosophical Explorations 7 (3):281 – 297.
William Rehg (2000). Critical Science Studies as Argumentation Theory: Who's Afraid of Ssk? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (1):33-48.
Andrew Crane & Trish Ruebottom (2011). Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):77-87.
Henk Ten Have (1995). The Anthropological Tradition in the Philosophy of Medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (1).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-03-09Total downloads11 ( #99,573 of 549,117 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,117 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
