Types, tokens, and propositions: Quine's alternative to propositions
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (3):361-375 (1984)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStephen Schiffer (2007). Propositions, What Are They Good For? In R. Schantz (ed.), Current Issues in Theoretical Philosophy: Prospects for Meaning Vol. 3. Walter de Gruyter.
André Fuhrmann (2002). Russell's Way Out of the Paradox of Propositions. History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (3):197-213.
André Fuhrmann (2002). Russell's Way Out of the Paradox of Propositions. History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (3):197-213.
Kevin C. Klement, Russell-Myhill Paradox. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Jeffrey C. King (2013). On Fineness of Grain. Philosophical Studies 163 (3):763-781.
William J. Rapaport (1976). On Cogito Propositions. Philosophical Studies 29 (1):63-68.
Danièle Moyal-Sharrock (2000). Wittgenstein Distinguished: A Response to Pieranna Garavaso. Philosophical Investigations 23 (1):54–69.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads15 ( #78,702 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,113 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
