David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Education and Culture 23 (1):55-72 (2007)
: The purposes of this critical analysis are to clarify why high stakes testing reforms have become so prevalent in the United States and to explain the connection between current federal and state emphases on standardized testing reforms and educational opportunities. The article outlines the policy context for high stakes examinations, as well as the ideas of testing and accountability as major tenets of current education reform and policy. In partial explanation of the widespread acceptance and use of standardized tests in the United States, we argue that there is a pervasive testing culture, in addition to other contributing factors such as administrative utility, profit motives, and political ideology. Finally, we offer a critique of high stakes testing reforms in light of concerns about equality of educational opportunity
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Russell Armstrong (2008). Mandatory Hiv Testing in Pregnancy: Is There Ever a Time? Developing World Bioethics 8 (1):1–10.
Thaddeus Metz (2005). The Ethics of Routine HIV Testing: A Respect-Based Analysis. South African Journal on Human Rights 21 (3):370-405.
Bertrand Munier & Costin Zaharia (2002). High Stakes and Acceptance Behavior in Ultimatum Bargaining. Theory and Decision 53 (3):187-207.
Andrew Davis (2006). High Stakes Testing and the Structure of the Mind: A Reply to Randall Curren. Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (1):1–16.
George Munchus (1989). Testing as a Selection Tool: Another Old and Sticky Managerial Human Rights Issue. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (10):817 - 820.
Robert Wood (1986). Aptitude Testing Is Not an Engine for Equalising Educational Opportunity. British Journal of Educational Studies 34 (1):26 - 37.
Matthew K. Wynia (2006). Routine Screening: Informed Consent, Stigma and the Waning of HIV Exceptionalism. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):5 – 8.
Mary B. Mahowald (2004). Book Review: Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch. Prenatal Testing: A Review of Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2000; and Rayna Rapp. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. [REVIEW] Hypatia 19 (3):216-221.
Martin Gunderson, David J. Mayo & Frank S. Rhame (1996). Routine HIV Testing of Hospital Patients and Pregnant Women: Informed Consent in the Real World. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):161-182.
Adil E. Shamoo & Jonathan D. Moreno (2004). Ethics of Research Involving Mandatory Drug Testing of High School Athletes in Oregon. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):25 – 31.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #227,904 of 1,725,443 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,739 of 1,725,443 )
How can I increase my downloads?