Reconstructing Lakatos: A reassessment of Lakatos' epistemological project in the light of the Lakatos archive
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (3):487-509 (2002)
Based on the material in the Lakatos Archive, this paper reconstructs, and then re-assesses, Lakatos' epistemological project by placing it in the context of the debate on the role of reason in the history of science, and of the justification of rationality as a normative notion. It is claimed that Lakatos' most fruitful ideas come from a peculiar philosophical combination of Hegelian historicism and Popperian fallibilism. The original tension, however, cannot be ultimately resolved. As a consequence, the problems that Lakatos has to deal with in his attempt to justify a set of genuinely epistemological canons of scientific rationality that are not reducible to psychology or sociology of knowledge stand as a warning for any normative philosophy of science that takes history at its face value.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Hermann Bondi, Wolfgang Yourgrau & Allen duPont Breck (eds.) (1970). Physics, Logic, and History. New York,Plenum Press.
Solomon Feferman (1978). The Logic of Mathematical Discovery Vs. The Logical Structure of Mathematics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:309 - 327.
Paul K. Feyerabend (1976). On the Critique of Scientific Reason. In R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend & M. Wartofsky (eds.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Reidel. 109--143.
Arthur Fine (1978). Conceptual Change in Mathematics and Science: Lakatos' Stretching Refined. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:328 - 341.
Gábor Forrai (1993). From the Method of Proofs and Refutations to the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (2):161-175.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jerome R. Ravetz (2004). An Hungarian Tragedy. Inquiry 47 (4):413 – 422.
Stefania Ruzsits Jha (2006). The Bid to Transcend Popper, and the Lakatos-Polanyi Connection. Perspectives on Science 14 (3):318-346.
U. Steinvorth (1980). Lakatos Und Politische Theorie. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 11 (1):135-146.
Paul Ernest (1997). The Legacy of Lakatos: Reconceptualising the Philosophy of Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 5 (2):116-134.
Brendan Larvor (2000). Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend for and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos–Feyerabend Correspondence. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922.
Stephen J. Wykstra (1982). Curried Lakatos or, How Not to Spice Up the Norm-Ladenness Thesis. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:29 - 39.
Gabor Forrai (2002). Lakatos, Reason, and Rationality. In G. Kampis L. Kvasz & M. Stöltzner (eds.), Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology, and the Man. Kluwer.
Brendan P. Larvor (1997). Lakatos as Historian of Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 5 (1):42-64.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #237,748 of 1,102,039 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #192,049 of 1,102,039 )
How can I increase my downloads?