David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (4):451-481 (2003)
The purpose of this paper is to explore the possibility of a new form of right that is both antidisciplinarian and liberated from sovereignty, the term Michel Foucault uses for what he claims to be the traditional theme of modern political philosophy. Some attempts to derive a theory of right from Foucaults critique have been made. However, by their own admission they do not yield a coherent and adequate theory, and other work has demonstrated the major problems inherent in Foucaults critique that render such a project problematic. This paper takes a different approach by revising the philosophical foundations of modern democracy with the goal of developing a new theory of right that addresses the problems that Foucault identified. To provide a theoretical context for this exploration, Foucaults key concepts of disciplinary technologies, power, the construction and maintenance of human subjects, and the role of the human body in human subjection are briefly reviewed. The main analysis will focus on the ideas of three political theorists whose respective works represent the core of sovereignty, and who are indisputably basic to any student of Western political theory, namely Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. The aim of this analysis is not to provide another critique of their virtues and shortcomings. Instead, the work of these thinkers is used in a pragmatic way, to elicit a new form of right that could serve as a counter to disciplinary power. Key Words: civil right Enlightenment Foucault natural right political philosophy political theory postmodern critique social justice.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ben Golder (2013). Foucault, Rights and Freedom. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):5-21.
Jacques de Ville (2011). Rethinking Power and Law: Foucault's Society Must Be Defended. [REVIEW] International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 24 (2):211-226.
Similar books and articles
Réal Fillion (2004). Freedom, Responsibility, and the ‘American Foucault’. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (1):115-126.
Catherine Mills (2010). A Manner of Speaking: Declaration, Critique and the Trope of Interrogation. Law and Critique 21 (3):247--260.
Antonio Calcagno (2009). Foucault and Derrida: The Question of Empowering and Disempowering the Author. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (1):33 - 51.
Colin Koopman (2010). Revising Foucault: The History and Critique of Modernity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (5):545-565.
Sara Mills (2003). Michel Foucault. Routledge.
Dieter Freundlieb (1988). Rationalism V. Irrationalism? Habermas's Response to Foucault. Inquiry 31 (2):171 – 192.
Jeremy R. Carrette (2000). Foucault and Religion: Spiritual Corporality and Political Spirituality. Routledge.
Dianna Taylor (2003). Practicing Politics with Foucault and Kant: Toward a Critical Life. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (3):259-280.
Jon Simons (1995). Foucault & the Political. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #334,518 of 1,940,954 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,798 of 1,940,954 )
How can I increase my downloads?