After Foucault: A new form of right
Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (4):451-481 (2003)
| Abstract | The purpose of this paper is to explore the possibility of a new form of right that is both antidisciplinarian and liberated from ‘sovereignty’, the term Michel Foucault uses for what he claims to be the traditional theme of modern political philosophy. Some attempts to derive a theory of right from Foucault’s critique have been made. However, by their own admission they do not yield a coherent and adequate theory, and other work has demonstrated the major problems inherent in Foucault’s critique that render such a project problematic. This paper takes a different approach by revising the philosophical foundations of modern democracy with the goal of developing a new theory of right that addresses the problems that Foucault identified. To provide a theoretical context for this exploration, Foucault’s key concepts of disciplinary technologies, power, the construction and maintenance of human subjects, and the role of the human body in human subjection are briefly reviewed. The main analysis will focus on the ideas of three political theorists whose respective works represent the core of ‘sovereignty’, and who are indisputably basic to any student of Western political theory, namely Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. The aim of this analysis is not to provide another critique of their virtues and shortcomings. Instead, the work of these thinkers is used in a pragmatic way, to elicit a new form of right that could serve as a counter to disciplinary power. Key Words: civil right • Enlightenment • Foucault • natural right • political philosophy • political theory • postmodern critique • social justice. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRéal Fillion (2004). Freedom, Responsibility, and the ‘American Foucault’. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (1):115-126.
Catherine Mills (2010). A Manner of Speaking: Declaration, Critique and the Trope of Interrogation. Law and Critique 21 (3):247--260.
Antonio Calcagno (2009). Foucault and Derrida: The Question of Empowering and Disempowering the Author. Human Studies 32 (1):33 - 51.
Colin Koopman (2010). Revising Foucault: The History and Critique of Modernity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (5):545-565.
Sara Mills (2003). Michel Foucault. Routledge.
Dieter Freundlieb (1988). Rationalism V. Irrationalism? Habermas's Response to Foucault. Inquiry 31 (2):171 – 192.
Jeremy R. Carrette (2000). Foucault and Religion: Spiritual Corporality and Political Spirituality. Routledge.
Dianna Taylor (2003). Practicing Politics with Foucault and Kant: Toward a Critical Life. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (3):259-280.
Jon Simons (1995). Foucault & the Political. Routledge.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #113,941 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
