David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 11 (3):161 – 178 (2001)
In this article, through a comparative analysis of Dewey's and Laozi's relevant accounts, I examine a pragmatic insight concerning moral rules and moral experience to the effect that (i) fixed and formulated moral rules should not be taken as the final absolute moral authority, and (ii) attention needs to be paid to the moral agent's own moral experience that responds to the felt demands in concrete situations. The purpose of this paper is to enhance understanding the crucial points of the pragmatic insight and to look at how, in certain complementary ways, Dewey's and Laozi's distinct approaches could contribute to the pragmatic insight and learn from each other. I endeavour to show several points: (1) The pragmatic insight has its distinct metaphysical foundations in Dewey's and Laozi's accounts, whose combination could enhance each other's visions and overcome each other's limitations; (2) Both Dewey and Laozi reject some sharp dualism to look at the nature of moral experience that responds to the felt demands in concrete situations; in so doing, their distinct focuses on different aspects, or developing stages, of such moral experience could be complementarily coordinated into a whole; (3) Their characterisations of the pragmatic insight are also based upon their distinct but related naturalistic perspectives to human moral foundation; Laozi's approach could provide some constructive insight for and due natural limitations on Dewey's account.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Wing-tsit Chan (1963). A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, N.J.,Princeton University Press.
John Dewey (1929). Ethics. New York, H. Holt and Company;.
Bo Mou (2000). Ultimate Concern and Language Engagement: A Reexamination of the Opening Message of the Dao-de-Jing. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 27 (4):429–439.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nicholas O. Pagan (2008). Configuring the Moral Self: Aristotle and Dewey. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 13 (3-4):239-250.
Hektor K. T. Yan (2009). A Paradox of Virtue: The Daodejing on Virtue and Moral Philosophy. Philosophy East and West 59 (2):pp. 173-187.
Robert Audi (1998). The Axiology of Moral Experience. Journal of Ethics 2 (4):355-375.
Elizabeth Anderson (2005). Moral Heuristics: Rigid Rules or Flexible Inputs in Moral Deliberation? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):544-545.
Scott R. Stroud (2007). Orientational Meliorism in Dewey and Dōgen. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (1):185-215.
Gregory Fernando Pappas (1993). Dewey and Feminism: The Affective and Relationships in Dewey's Ethics. Hypatia 8 (2):78 - 95.
Randy L. Friedman (2006). Deweyan Pragmatism. William James Studies 1 (1).
Hanah A. Chapman & Adam K. Anderson (2011). Varieties of Moral Emotional Experience. Emotion Review 3 (3):255-257.
Jason Brennan (2008). Beyond the Bottom Line: The Theoretical Goals of Moral Theorizing. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (2):277-296.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #158,386 of 1,796,189 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #85,286 of 1,796,189 )
How can I increase my downloads?