Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):113-137 (2013)
|Abstract||Situationist research in social psychology focuses on the situational factors that influence behavior. Doris and Harman argue that this research has powerful implications for ethics, and virtue ethics in particular. First, they claim that situationist research presents an empirical challenge to the moral psychology presumed within virtue ethics. Second, they argue that situationist research supports a theoretical challenge to virtue ethics as a foundation for ethical behavior and moral development. I offer a response from moral psychology using an interpretation of Xunzi—a Confucian virtue ethicist from the Classical period. This Confucian account serves as a foil to the situationist critique in that it uncovers many problematic ontological and normative assumptions at work in this debate regarding the prediction and explanation of behavior, psychological posits, moral development, and moral education. Xunzi’s account of virtue ethics not only responds to the situationist empirical challenge by uncovering problematic assumptions about moral psychology, but also demonstrates that it is not a separate empirical hypothesis. Further, Xunzi’s virtue ethic responds to the theoretical challenge by offering a new account of moral development and a ground for ethical norms that fully attends to situational features while upholding robust character traits.|
|Keywords||Situationism Confucian Virtue ethics Moral development Xunzi Character traits Moral psychology Ritual Doris Harman|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christian Miller (forthcoming). The Real Challenge to Virtue Ethics From Psychology. In Snow Nancy & Trivigno Franco (eds.), The Philosophy and Psychology of Virtue: An Empirical Approach to Character and Happiness. Routledge.
Deborah S. Mower (2010). Scripting Situations in Moral Education. Teaching Ethics 11 (1):93-106.
Mark Alfano (forthcoming). Identifying and Defending the Hard Core of Virtue Ethics. Journal of Philosophical Research.
Edward Slingerland (2011). The Situationist Critique and Early Confucian Virtue Ethics. Ethics 121 (2):390-419.
Miguel Alzola (2012). The Possibility of Virtue. Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2):377-404.
Christian Miller (forthcoming). Character and Moral Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Jesse Prinz (2009). The Normativity Challenge: Cultural Psychology Provides the Real Threat to Virtue Ethics. Journal of Ethics 13 (2-3):117 - 144.
Chris Tucker (2005). Harman Vs. Virtue Theory. Southwest Philosophy Review 21 (1):137-145.
Christian Miller (2009). Empathy, Social Psychology, and Global Helping Traits. Philosophical Studies 142 (2):247 - 275.
Christian Miller (forthcoming). The Problem of Character. In van Hooft Stan & Saunders Nicole (eds.), The Handbook of Virtue Ethics. Acumen Publishing.
Vincent A. Punzo (1996). After Kohlberg: Virtue Ethics and the Recovery of the Moral Self. Philosophical Psychology 9 (1):7 – 23.
Jonathan Webber (2013). Character, Attitude and Disposition. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1).
Gopal Sreenivasan (2002). Errors About Errors: Virtue Theory and Trait Attribution. Mind 111 (441):47-68.
Christian Miller (2003). Social Psychology and Virtue Ethics. Journal of Ethics 7 (4):365-392.
Added to index2011-11-09
Total downloads44 ( #25,360 of 549,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,205 of 549,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?