David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavior and Philosophy 27 (2):97 - 125 (1999)
Different accounts of Skinner's work are often in conflict. Some interpretations, for example, regard Skinner as a mechanist. Other interpretations regard Skinner as a selectionist. An alternative interpretation is to see Skinner as employing both views with changes in these views and their proportionate relations over time. To clarify these distinctions, it is helpful to see Skinner's work against the background of similar changes that have been taking place in Western Culture. An extended and overlapping shift in cultural values has occurred from modernism to postmodernism. Some key distinctions in this shift are that modernism emphasizes abstract simplicity, permanent necessity, and absolutely certain sources of truth. Postmodernism emphasizes complex and concrete contexts, probability, and explanations of change in terms of consequences. Skinner shows a similarly extended and overlapping shift over time that results in separate sets of responses which may be regarded as two sides or two selves of Skinner: one an organized collection of responses aligned with modernism, another an organized collection of responses aligned with postmodernism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Roy A. Moxley (2001). The Modern/Postmodern Context of Skinner's Selectionist Turn in 1945. Behavior and Philosophy 29:121 - 153.
Roy A. Moxley (1997). Skinner: From Determinism to Random Variation. Behavior and Philosophy 25 (1):3 - 28.
Roy A. Moxley (1997). Skinner: From Essentialist to Selectionist Meaning. Behavior and Philosophy 25 (2):95 - 119.
Roy A. Moxley (1996). The Import of Skinner's Three-Term Contingency. Behavior and Philosophy 24 (2):145 - 167.
Roy A. Moxley (2006). B. F. Skinner's Other Positivistic Book: "Walden Two". Behavior and Philosophy 34:19 - 37.
B. F. Skinner (1971). Beyond Freedom and Dignity. Penguin Books.
Anthony Burns (2011). Conceptual History and the Philosophy of the Later Wittgenstein: A Critique of Quentin Skinners Contextualist Method. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (1):54-83.
Quentin Skinner (1996). Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge University Press.
Quentin Skinner (2002). Visions of Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Nathan Tarcov (1982). Quentin Skinner's Method and Machiavelli's Prince:The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Vol. 1: The Renaissance. Quentin Skinner; The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Vol. 2: The Age of Reformation. Quentin Skinner. [REVIEW] Ethics 92 (4):692-.
W. A. Rottschaefer (1990). Fulmer's Skinner and Skinner's Values. Journal of Value Inquiry 14 (1):55-63.
Judith L. Scharff (1999). Skinner's Reinforcement Theory: A Heideggerian Assessment of Its Empirical Success and Philosophical Failure. Behavior and Philosophy 27 (1):1 - 17.
Matthew H. Kramer (2001). On the Unavoidability of Actions: Quentin Skinner, Thomas Hobbes, and the Modern Doctrine of Negative Liberty. Inquiry 44 (3):315 – 330.
Carl G. Hedman (1974). An Anarchist Reply to Skinner on 'Weak' Methods of Control. Inquiry 17 (1-4):105 – 111.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads11 ( #113,077 of 1,089,100 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #30,976 of 1,089,100 )
How can I increase my downloads?