Compulsory brain scans and genetic tests for boxers--or should boxing be banned?

Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5):515-516 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Compulsory genetic tests which reveal a predisposition to brain damage could be of more use in preventing harm than brain scans which show that damage has already occurredAmid calls for a ban on boxing the Victorian government in Australia introduced compulsory brain scans for professional boxers in June 2001. Some people think the introduction of this new law is a “tough” measure. Others think the law is of limited value because the damage has already occurred by the time something shows up on a brain scan. The Victorian government is also considering the introduction of compulsory genetic tests that indicate a predisposition to brain damage.Nathan Croucher, a 24 year old construction worker and champion amateur boxer has been banned from professional boxing after a compulsory brain scan showed an abnormality which makes him susceptible …

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Key Moral Issue: Should Boxing Be Banned?Ken Jones - 2001 - Culture, Sport Society 4 (1):63-72.
Precursors to theories of mind in nonhuman brains.Stephen F. Walker - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):131-132.
Respecting privacy in detecting illegitimate enhancements in athletes.Sarah Teetzel - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (2):159 – 170.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
57 (#269,932)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Out for the count.Mark Johnson - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (4):589-589.

Add more references