David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2):103-107 (2000)
In an influential essay entitled Why abortion is wrong, Donald Marquis argues that killing actual persons is wrong because it unjustly deprives victims of their future; that the fetus has a future similar in morally relevant respects to the future lost by competent adult homicide victims, and that, as consequence, abortion is justifiable only in the same circumstances in which killing competent adult human beings is justifiable.1 The metaphysical claim implicit in the first premise, that actual persons have a future of value, is ambiguous. The Future Like Ours argument (FLO) would be valid if “future of value” were used consistently to mean either “potential future of value” or “self-represented future of value”, and FLO would be sound if one or the other interpretation supported both the moral claim and the metaphysical claim, but if, as I argue, any interpretation which makes the argument valid renders it unsound, then FLO must be rejected. Its apparent strength derives from equivocation on the concept of “a future of value”
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dean Stretton (2004). The Deprivation Argument Against Abortion. Bioethics 18 (2):144–180.
Phil Gosselin (2000). Can the Potentiality Argument Survive the Contraception Reduction? Journal of Philosophical Research 25:437-458.
David F. Walbert (1973). Abortion, Society, and the Law. Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
E. Conee (1999). Metaphysics and the Morality of Abortion. Mind 108 (432):619-646.
Christopher Wareham (2009). Deprivation and the See-Saw of Death. South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):246-56.
Richard Schoenig (1998). Abortion, Christianity, and Consistency. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 5 (1):32-37.
Lara Denis (2007). Abortion and Kant's Formula of Universal Law. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):547-580.
Kimberley Brownlee (2013). A Human Right Against Social Deprivation. Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):199-222.
M. Klein (1990). Determinism, Blameworthiness, and Deprivation. Oxford University Press.
Marvin Kohl (1971). Abortion and the Argument From Innocence. Inquiry 14 (1-4):147-151.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads33 ( #97,829 of 1,727,073 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #61,095 of 1,727,073 )
How can I increase my downloads?