Trust in Nanotechnology? On Trust as Analytical Tool in Social Research on Emerging Technologies
Nanoethics 5 (1):15-28 (2011)
| Abstract | Trust has become an important aspect of evaluating the relationship between lay public and technology implementation. Experiences have shown that a focus on trust provides a richer understanding of reasons for backlashes of technology in society than a mere focus of public understanding of risks and science communication. Therefore, trust is also widely used as a key concept for understanding and predicting trust or distrust in emerging technologies. But whereas trust broadens the scope for understanding established technologies with well-defined questions and controversies, it easily fails to do so with emerging technologies, where there are no shared questions, a lack of public familiarity with the technology in question, and a restricted understanding amongst social researchers as to where distrust is likely to arise and how and under which form the technology will actually be implemented. Rather contrary, ‘trust’ might sometimes even direct social research into fixed structures that makes it even more difficult for social research to provide socially robust knowledge. This article therefore suggests that if trust is to maintain its important role in evaluating emerging technologies, the approach has to be widened and initially focus not on people’s motivations for trust, but rather the object of trust it self, as to predicting how and where distrust might appear, how the object is established as an object of trust, and how it is established in relation with the public. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTrond Åm (2011). Trust in Nanotechnology? On Trust as Analytical Tool in Social Research on Emerging Technologies. Nanoethics 5 (1):15-28.
John Weckert (2010). Comments on “Trust and New Communication Technologies: Vicious Circles, Virtuous Circles, Possible Futures”. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):307-309.
Robert C. Solomon (1998). Creating Trust. Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):205-232.
Sacha Loeve & Mickaël Normand (2011). How to Trust a Molecule? The Case of Cyclodextrins Entering the Nanorealm. In Torben B. Zülsdorf, Christopher Coenen, Ulrich Fiedeler, Arianna Ferrari, Colin Milburn & Matthia Wienroth (eds.), Quantum Engagements. Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies. IOS Press.
Asle H. Kiran & Peter-Paul Verbeek (2010). Trusting Our Selves to Technology. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):409-427.
Trudy Govier (1992). Trust, Distrust, and Feminist Theory. Hypatia 7 (1):16 - 33.
Zubin Master & David B. Resnik (2013). Hype and Public Trust in Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):321-335.
Klasien Horstman (2000). Technology and the Management of Trust in Insurance Medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (1).
Mark Coeckelbergh (2012). Can We Trust Robots? Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):53-60.
Marek Kohn (2008). Trust: Self-Interest and the Common Good. Oxford University Press.
S. D. Noam Cook (2010). Making the Technological Trustworthy. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):455-459.
Lars Hertzberg (1988). On the Attitude of Trust. Inquiry 31 (3):307 – 322.
Doran Smolkin (2008). Puzzles About Trust. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):431-449.
Doran Smolkin (2008). Puzzles About Trust. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):431-449.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-09-08Total downloads1 ( #274,982 of 549,224 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,224 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
